Login

russian armor

How to understand scatter/area effect?

27 Sep 2013, 07:14 AM
#1
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

If I understand correctly scatter and area effect determine how effective a tank is against infantry. Looking at coh2 stats, there are allot of figures involved but I can see only 3 figures changing between tanks:

Scatter: distance max
Area Effect: distance far and distance near

What do those number mean and how do they effect each tank differently?

Thanks


27 Sep 2013, 07:22 AM
#2
avatar of JohanSchwarz

Posts: 409

Scatter is the max distance a tank shell can land in front or behind its intended target due to RNG.

AoE is the splash damage that the tank shell does upon impact. The splash does full damage at distance near, zero damage at distance far, and porportionate scaling in between.
27 Sep 2013, 08:07 AM
#3
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Scatter is the max distance a tank shell can land in front or behind its intended target due to RNG.

AoE is the splash damage that the tank shell does upon impact. The splash does full damage at distance near, zero damage at distance far, and porportionate scaling in between.

Just want to add that this mostly concerns infantry since tanks have a low chance of scoring a hit on an soldier, therefore most of the damage they inflict to infantry is through the Area of effect on "missed" shots.
27 Sep 2013, 08:10 AM
#4
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

Scatter is the max distance a tank shell can land in front or behind its intended target due to RNG.

AoE is the splash damage that the tank shell does upon impact. The splash does full damage at distance near, zero damage at distance far, and porportionate scaling in between.


Thanks Johan. Based on this:

distance max: lower number is better because it means even if the tank misses, the shell will still land close to the target

distance far: higher number is better because the shell has a bigger area to do damage before making 0 damage

distance near: higher number is better because the shell has a bigger area to make full damage

Looking at some example, the t34-85 (2.6, 1.25, .625) will almost always make a kill for every hit where as the t34-76 (6.9, 1.25, .625) can easily miss shots.
27 Sep 2013, 08:11 AM
#5
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896


Just want to add that this mostly concerns infantry since tanks have a low chance of scoring a hit on an soldier, therefore most of the damage they inflict to infantry is through the Area of effect on "missed" shots.


Because soldiers have very small size (1?) which also effects accuracy?
27 Sep 2013, 08:11 AM
#6
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

27 Sep 2013, 08:17 AM
#7
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Sep 2013, 08:11 AMAbdul


Because soldiers have very small size (1?) which also effects accuracy?

Yes exactly.

I also remember in a developer stream that they talked about how a low scatter can actually work against you since when units are on the move, the tank would fire at where they were rather than hitting where they could be, such as the brummbar which has a near perfect scatter.
27 Sep 2013, 09:53 AM
#8
avatar of Endeav

Posts: 170

Scatter is the max distance a tank shell can land in front or behind its intended target due to RNG.

AoE is the splash damage that the tank shell does upon impact. The splash does full damage at distance near, zero damage at distance far, and porportionate scaling in between.


Couple corrections:

Scatter angle is the angle left or right of the target the shot may miss, dependant on range to target. Scatter distance is the distance front and back the shot may miss, with the distance set on the center of the target. The center of distance max may change bases on scatter offset, but typically this doesn't change much.

Area of effect does full damage from 0 to near aoe distance, then linearly scaling (same as accuracy range scaling) damage between near and far aoe ranges. At far range aoe weapons do .2 damage out to the aoe radius. Example:

T34 .625 near, 1.25 far, 2.5 radius. All aoe weapons have 1.0 damage multiplier near and. 2 damage multiplier far scaling.

From range 0 to .625 is 1.0 damage, from .625 to 1.25 range scales between the multipliers (i.e at range .9375 gives a. 6 multiplier), and from range 1.25 to 2.5 gives .2 damage.
27 Sep 2013, 17:18 PM
#9
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Sep 2013, 09:53 AMEndeav


Couple corrections:

Scatter angle is the angle left or right of the target the shot may miss, dependant on range to target. Scatter distance is the distance front and back the shot may miss, with the distance set on the center of the target. The center of distance max may change bases on scatter offset, but typically this doesn't change much.

Area of effect does full damage from 0 to near aoe distance, then linearly scaling (same as accuracy range scaling) damage between near and far aoe ranges. At far range aoe weapons do .2 damage out to the aoe radius. Example:

T34 .625 near, 1.25 far, 2.5 radius. All aoe weapons have 1.0 damage multiplier near and. 2 damage multiplier far scaling.

From range 0 to .625 is 1.0 damage, from .625 to 1.25 range scales between the multipliers (i.e at range .9375 gives a. 6 multiplier), and from range 1.25 to 2.5 gives .2 damage.


ok so you are saying from 0 distance up to near distance rating gives full damage and from near to far distance rating gives linearly scaling decrease in damage until it hits zero once it hits the far limit.

What is the accuracy scaling you are referring to?
27 Sep 2013, 18:22 PM
#10
avatar of rofltehcat

Posts: 604

He is referring to Area of Effect. So for example you have an explosion: Soviet Mortar stats

Let's say the mortar shell lands somewhere and causes an explosion. Its Area Effect Near Distance is 1.5 and the Damage Near multiplier is 1.0. So inside a circle of the radius 1.5 the explosion deals 100% of the mortar shell's damage, so 80 damage if the target is inside.

Its "Distance Far" is 3.0 and the damage multiplier for "far" is 0.25. So if the target is standing exactly 3 from the explosion's center, (and if hit), it takes 25% of the mortar's damage, 20.
Actually it even takes those 25% damage if it is farther away than the distance of 3 because the third zone, (Area Radius) is 6. So a unit between 3 and 6 from the center can take 20 damage.

Between "Far" (3.0) and "Near" (1.5) it scales in a linear manner. You can see this at the top of the page I linked: The blue damage line is at a high level (100%) until it reaches a distance of 1.5, then drops linear until it is at 25% at 3.0 and then stays at 25% all the way out to 6.

The same counts for the explosion's accuracy: It has a "Near" accuracy of 5 and a "Far" accuracy of 0.6. So between "Near distance (1.5)" and "Far distance (3.0)" the accuracy of the explosion decreases but inside the Near circle and in the ring between 3 and 6 distance units, it is constant.
This means that if the target is between 3 to 6 distance units from the explosion's center, the explosion has a chance of only 60% to deal damage at all. This is why sometimes some units don't take damage despite being "closer" to the explosion and some "farther" away still take damage. It is just random.

The "accuracy/damage scaling" is basically just a linear interpolation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_interpolation
This can be applied to most stats (accuracy, splash damage, cooldown multipliers) in the game, from the accuracy of small arms to the biggest explosions.
28 Sep 2013, 08:41 AM
#11
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

He is referring to Area of Effect. So for example you have an explosion: Soviet Mortar stats

Let's say the mortar shell lands somewhere and causes an explosion. Its Area Effect Near Distance is 1.5 and the Damage Near multiplier is 1.0. So inside a circle of the radius 1.5 the explosion deals 100% of the mortar shell's damage, so 80 damage if the target is inside.

Its "Distance Far" is 3.0 and the damage multiplier for "far" is 0.25. So if the target is standing exactly 3 from the explosion's center, (and if hit), it takes 25% of the mortar's damage, 20.
Actually it even takes those 25% damage if it is farther away than the distance of 3 because the third zone, (Area Radius) is 6. So a unit between 3 and 6 from the center can take 20 damage.

Between "Far" (3.0) and "Near" (1.5) it scales in a linear manner. You can see this at the top of the page I linked: The blue damage line is at a high level (100%) until it reaches a distance of 1.5, then drops linear until it is at 25% at 3.0 and then stays at 25% all the way out to 6.

The same counts for the explosion's accuracy: It has a "Near" accuracy of 5 and a "Far" accuracy of 0.6. So between "Near distance (1.5)" and "Far distance (3.0)" the accuracy of the explosion decreases but inside the Near circle and in the ring between 3 and 6 distance units, it is constant.
This means that if the target is between 3 to 6 distance units from the explosion's center, the explosion has a chance of only 60% to deal damage at all. This is why sometimes some units don't take damage despite being "closer" to the explosion and some "farther" away still take damage. It is just random.

The "accuracy/damage scaling" is basically just a linear interpolation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_interpolation
This can be applied to most stats (accuracy, splash damage, cooldown multipliers) in the game, from the accuracy of small arms to the biggest explosions.


Hey thanks allot man, that was really helpful!

See comment in bold, do all soldiers in the area get each 80 damage, or is the 80 damage spread over the number of soldiers in the area?
28 Sep 2013, 09:59 AM
#12
avatar of alexshiro

Posts: 62

Every soldier in the area gets 80 damage. That's how it wipes out squads.
28 Sep 2013, 17:51 PM
#13
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896

Every soldier in the area gets 80 damage. That's how it wipes out squads.


ok, that makes sense.


On a related note, the tiger and t34 share the same scatter and area stats, except that tiger has better scatter distance 4.3 vs 6.9. Given that the tiger damage is higher, that means the tiger should be much better in killing infantry, but in practice I don't find it particularly better. Are there any additional factors influencing this?
28 Sep 2013, 19:55 PM
#14
avatar of Endeav

Posts: 170

Tiger is shooting at larger squads, t34 shoots at smaller squads. Larger squad is more likely to spread out versus a smaller one.
0 user is browsing this thread:

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
Yesterday, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
Yesterday, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
Yesterday, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! :P
Yesterday, 10:49 AM
Willy Pete: Cool you wanna lose your stock lategame arty too then?
Yesterday, 03:20 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. :rofl:
Last Wednesday, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
Last Tuesday, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
Last Tuesday, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Soheil: Coh2 is dead , full of map hackers , and lelic knows that but ...
Last Tuesday, 01:26 AM
aerafield: Oh how I missed the weird spam bots, welcome back :banana:
Last Monday, 13:05 PM
situsgbo777: Platform game online terpercaya dengan berbagai pilihan permainan seru dan peluang menang besar. Nikmati pengalaman bermain terbaik hanya di GBO777
Last Monday, 06:48 AM
OKSpitfire: @aerafield that does sound familiar
Last Sunday, 09:06 AM
aerafield: @Lady Xenarra :rofl:
Last Sunday, 01:45 AM
Lady Xenarra: Ah, the gren faust-replacing-rifles bug/exploit. :ph34r:
Last Saturday, 18:24 PM
aerafield: CoH3 high elo is truly the dumbest CoH experience that ever existed
Last Saturday, 17:25 PM
aerafield: @OKSpitfire tbh I find it quite challenging to get the Pershing in time, having to suffer through the CoH3 tickrate and this endless bullshit meta of massive blobs going back and forth to the forward heal truck
Last Saturday, 17:24 PM
OKSpitfire: Well... going to be seeing the Pershing a lot for a little while, that thing is a monster.
Last Saturday, 11:44 AM
NigelBallsworth: axis stuff is getting more meme by the second
28 Feb 2025, 23:32 PM

Livestreams

unknown 9

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

286 users are online: 286 guests
0 post in the last 24h
20 posts in the last week
60 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52319
Welcome our newest member, j8869net
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM