What makes brits emplacment to a building?
Posts: 2243
brit emplacments can:
- use abitys (like pak43) (unlike schwerer from OKW = is building)
- can be command where it has to shoot at (like pak43) (unlike schwerer from OKW = is building)
- they even get vet (like pak43) (unlike schwerer from OKW = is building)
- doesnt show stats in statistics after game (unlike pak43) (like schwerer from OKW = is building)
They even cost popcap! = UNIT
They doesnt show up in statics...because of "building" but why are they buildings? Why cant we see their performanche?
Someone know?
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Because they're different.
Are you asking for all factions, all units to be alike?
As in mirror stat factions in every way ? Yes! Say Yes!
Posts: 2243
Because they're different.
Are you asking for all factions, all units to be alike?
As in mirror stat factions in every way ? Yes! Say Yes!
They working and are exactly same like other emplacements unit. Tell me one other Building which can get vet ...but doesnt shown in stastitc.
U cant answer "because they are different" without saying whats the differenz is. Looks like u dont know what u cant say anything usefully...but want to say something...
Posts: 3260
Because Relic gave them veterancy.
Posts: 2243
Are you asking why UKF buildings have veterancy?
Because Relic gave them veterancy.
And gave them abiltys and gave them the possibilty to command them where to shot? Yeah...make a Building the same like a unit instead using all functions from available units...
Sounds like a dumb plan.
Posts: 3260
And gave them abiltys and gave them the possibilty to command them where to shot? Yeah...make a Building the same like a unit instead using all functions from available units...
Sounds like a dumb plan.
Maybe.
Relic designed UKF to have emplacements as part of its army: they even appear as passives on the tech buildings. They're meant to be high investment emplacements you protect rather than throwaway stalling tools like bunkers, hence Brace and Veterancy.
In practice, that led to SimCity strategies, so it wasn't great for competitive multiplayer CoH 2.
The compstompers loved it though.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
And gave them abiltys and gave them the possibilty to command them where to shot? Yeah...make a Building the same like a unit instead using all functions from available units...
Sounds like a dumb plan.
Pop cap cost was also given, its not ost bunker which you can spam all around the map you know.
Posts: 2885
Now I'm not sure why they made it that way, but it is clearly a deliberate choice.
Posts: 223
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Pop cap cost was also given, its not ost bunker which you can spam all around the map you know.
UKF emplacements got vet. But they got popcap. Because Relic did it that way.
OST emplacement MG bunkers don't get vet but they have 0 popcap.
They're both OP in their own way.
Yea, they're different.
Are you saying they should be the same?
Are you saying you want british emplacements to be 0 vet like MG bunkers...
... But to also be 0 popcap?
Please. PLEASE say this is what you want Please say you want
Posts: 173
>sees tread about brits emplacements
>immedeatly starts talking stuff like "L2P", "playercard plz", "muh ASSimetrical gameplay"
>totally forgets that he have even more uncounterable stuff like free mg-s all over the field, good AI-sniper, AT capabilities from very start of the game
>keeps being all edgy and post-ironical
>OP just want to see statistics for brits emplacements to be sure, that they are really so cancerous as werhaboo says
Posts: 2243
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I loled after i realizes that even the flak emplcemnt from OKW is in the statistics! And it cant get attack ground, have no vet and is definitly a building... when this building can be in stastistic...why not brits "buildings"?
Because brit emplacements do not shit units out of them?
Posts: 2243
Because brit emplacements do not shit units out of them?
You mean the t4 schwerer truck building from OKW. I mean the flak emplacement which can be build with the right doctrine.
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Posts: 607
Posts: 1096
Katidoof getting rekt by ullumulu...glorious day lol
Are we reading the same thread here?
Posts: 1740
Livestreams
62 | |||||
4 | |||||
240 | |||||
27 | |||||
19 | |||||
11 | |||||
8 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Hanra274
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM