Login

russian armor

Ranger Should Use M1Garand instead M1Carbine ?

20 Jul 2018, 13:24 PM
#21
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

M1 carbine with accuracy (0.403/0.518/0.805) is good fight mid-close Range
when fight in open field it risk to get Focus fire first and lose model first
You tell use Riflemen garand is nerf for ranger
Why not give better Garand gun profile to ranger ?
like obersoldaten Aimbot Kar98K (in timing arrive should not level same obersoldaten)
Ranger Info Form Commander Card It tell Their are elite with marksmanship skill why their cannot use garand with better skill ?
(conscript Mosin and Guard mosin is not same Profile )


there's more to dps than mere accuracy.

the ranger carbine deal 10 damage compared to the rifleman garand's 8. the magizine on the carbine is also bigger (14 vs 8.5). Other facter led to higher dps for the ranger despite lower accuracy.

You can't just look at the accuracy and deduce dps from that. The coh tool have a dps export tool that spits out the dps of every weapon in the game.
20 Jul 2018, 14:06 PM
#22
avatar of wandererraven

Posts: 353

I test by 1-1 with Fallschirmjager (Reason 3 CP need)
Ranger need 1 BAR to win for long range shootout (400 MP 10 pop (need 60 mu)
For fight unit pure 380 mp 9 pop
I need more L2P for this moment
20 Jul 2018, 14:39 PM
#23
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

I think the reason no Rangers were used in GCS2 has more to do with USF build orders at high level play than Rangers being bad or having a non-optimal weapons profile. Short story is that it's very hard to squeeze in a 400 MP unit at 3 CP when you already have several rifles and officer unit - it just sets you up for MP bleed or missing out on a vital support weapon at that time of the game. Factor in higher unit preservation at that play level and the chances of having to replace a Rifle squad that early is minimal so you just see a lot of BARed up Rifles. Personally I find Rangers to be one of the best Infantry units in game when you consider their target size, veterancy, and DPS.
20 Jul 2018, 15:54 PM
#24
avatar of Mr.Flush

Posts: 450

I would like them to have the johnson's lmg, but I will take m1 grands instead too. The doctrine is quite strong in 1v1 and would require some adjusting to the pershing to keep it from being op. Pershing is a squad murdering machine currently.
20 Jul 2018, 16:20 PM
#25
avatar of wandererraven

Posts: 353

Pershing I Think AI Power same level compare Tiger
21 Jul 2018, 02:23 AM
#26
avatar of Mr.Flush

Posts: 450

Pershing I Think AI Power same level compare Tiger


It seems so. The pershing vets up faster, but it also dies quicker too. I would not mind if the pershing was locked until all buildings were researched.
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

695 users are online: 695 guests
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49427
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM