Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 3260
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I think that goes for any build in general: exploit what it can't do if you can't beat it at its own game.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 2243
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2243
The OP is talking about 2 churchills, no where is it mentioned that a FF is in the mix. If the opponent is able to get that much fuel then you should have proper counters for that considering how much fuel is needed just to get those units. Therefore by that time you should have panthers/jp4s/rakens which can deal with the churchills. Similarly mines or snares make the Churchills sitting ducks for AT.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
is funny how all upset about my criticism. but instead of refuting them they talk garbage and do not bring a counter-argument. only player card blaming. Something like that only make people who have no arguments. just like grammar trolls.
either: refute my criticism ... with factual arguments ... or you are just trolls.
Tipp: i have some replays where i won vs top 60 player.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
You want me to reply my post about army composition, impossibility of what you've said due to pop cap and that top player reply until you stop deflecting it?
And if you have replays of top 100 plays where you have beaten someone using dual churchill, feel free to upload them to actually reinforce your argument.
Posts: 935
Posts: 51
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Guys thanks for the Help. I will try to work on my game. Please don't turn threads into online word battles.
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
0 | ||
 |
|
|
778 | ||
|
|
|
|
30 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
