Veterancy on light vehicles

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 2181

Does anyone else feel like light vehicles (t-70, 221/2 and 251) get veterancy at too high of a rate? The 222 almost gets vet1 from killing an m3.
It's very noticeable on the german vehicles with the current vet systems where vet2 makes them so resilient to the atnades and such.
Ofcourse preservation should be rewarded but you dont need to kill a lot of stuff to get veterancy atm.

Posts: 219

Yeah, it's funny how a vet 2-3 ostheer halftrack can take several hits from a SU-85...

Posts: 480

Vet is based on the cost of the unit doing damage, hence light vehicles get it very quickly.

Posts: 2561

Which I think is fine since they are pretty easy to kill. It rewards keeping them alive.

Posts: 896

27 Aug 2013, 16:47 PMOmega_Warrior

Which I think is fine since they are pretty easy to kill. It rewards keeping them alive.

And it's easier for them to get vet than to kill them, which is what people are pointing out here.

Posts: 786

sometimes I manage to keep my M3 till late game, vet it 2 or 3, but still dies in a matter of instants

Posts: 337

It's really only a problem with the Armored Car, which is too cheap right now (and thus have very low vet requirements).

Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41

27 Aug 2013, 18:19 PMlink0

It's really only a problem with the Armored Car, which is too cheap right now (and thus have very low vet requirements).

It's also a problem on the flameht. It's not a problem on any of the soviet vehicles because the m3a1 has bad veterancy and a huge amount of counters on the field, and the t70 comes too late and vets a lot slower.

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned

Pfft.

Posts: 119

Type 221 after the upgunn upgrade, need a bit slower veterancy gain, i think, yes, and WM 251 HT after the flamenwerfer upgrade, too. Maybe after upgrade, a +25% slower veterancy would be good?