Posts: 3260
I feel like that would be too similar to other factions. Yet another engineer unit with a flamethrower. Putting it on the already powerful Sturms could be very OP as well. Just give the flame grenade to the Sturms and a regular grenade to Volks.
Posts: 1930
If flamer Sturms were OP wouldn't we see a lot more of Feuersturm doctrine?
Posts: 495 | Subs: 1
If flamer Sturms were OP wouldn't we see a lot more of Feuersturm doctrine?
Posts: 3260
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 728
Although lowering the amount of flamenades available would be good, sturms are just relied upon too much. They're supposed to sweep, repair, be AT with pschrecks, be the close quaters assualt unit, and then you want to put the garrison clear on them as well? They also have difficulty getting past vet 2 in most games and fall off once weapon upgrades come online.lol okay what do RE usf or brits do, dont win the first battles ever unlesss your oppnet is retarded and then just repair shit, rear echleon maybe double zooks, sturms have the shrek option. Try vetting either RE that cant fight at the start of the game with out upgrades.
Posts: 587
Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
Posts: 3260
Lovely, reverted the 222 armor buff and increased it's AI, because what Ostheer needs above all else is more AI (251 flame ht, pgrens, lmg grens, snipers and mortar) and not a lv that doesn't have to be repaired every 5 seconds so it can actually deter allied lv's.
Just lovely.
Posts: 46
Posts: 148
Posts: 587
Puma?
Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
lol okay what do RE usf or brits do, dont win the first battles ever unlesss your oppnet is retarded and then just repair shit, rear echleon maybe double zooks, sturms have the shrek option. Try vetting either RE that cant fight at the start of the game with out upgrades.
Posts: 138
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 503 | Subs: 1
lol okay what do RE usf or brits do, dont win the first battles ever unlesss your oppnet is retarded and then just repair shit, rear echleon maybe double zooks, sturms have the shrek option. Try vetting either RE that cant fight at the start of the game with out upgrades.
Posts: 44
 | Playercard of mcq_knight | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1217
Maybe im off base, but was there a dicsussion om giving the Tiger ace fuel cost +and+ keep the same penalties?I haven't seen a discussion about it. I think the penalty needs to go. You get punished and could just go for a regular Tiger for about the same initial cost which is only slightly weaker and can be called in again after a loss. Keeping the penalty is just overkill now.
Posts: 1930
lol okay what do RE usf or brits do, dont win the first battles ever unlesss your oppnet is retarded and then just repair shit, rear echleon maybe double zooks, sturms have the shrek option. Try vetting either RE that cant fight at the start of the game with out upgrades.
Yeah sure we can make StG side tech, so long as volks scale as well as rifles
Posts: 44
I haven't seen a discussion about it. I think the penalty needs to go. You get punished and could just go for a regular Tiger for about the same initial cost which is only slightly weaker and can be called in again after a loss. Keeping the penalty is just overkill now.
As I mentioned somewhere else, punishing a player for keeping a unit alife isn't good game design.
| Playercard of mcq_knight | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
against axis it's either the wehr or okw.
RE is still good enough against pio, and wehr usually go barrack build, leading to victory by default.
the problem is actually re/brit vs sturm. I would usually give the sturm the advantage in the initial rush.
the biggest reason rifle got the terminator veterancy because their 30% acc 23% def was inferior to the grenadier's 40% acc 23% def.
how about we standardize veterancy for line infantry to 30% 23% def for everyone?
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
