UKF/Brits suggestion.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 14:42 PMullumulu

My first post was:

"Brits are in ok status. problem is the super sov meta right now, which let the most players choose this faction insteed the brits.

Brits was in a boring status because mostly all units overperfomed and there was no fun because you had overall a big advantage against the enemy...which make it boring over long time."


There is no trolling etc. It was a conclusion from point of view. It was the actually gamestatus...everybody play sov because of super strongness actually. THis is not a lie etc...
And that i never played brits very much ...i told you why. No trolling etc. You was the first who flamed my playercard...

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 14:59 PMadamírcz

I guess the topic and point of the thread got missed by miles (number of plays and balance are hardly any relevant here)

I agree with the mortar garrisoning idea, but the rest seems too much

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 16:32 PMTheodosios

I strongly recommend to lay aside any ad hominem posts. Continue in a civilised manner with topic related posts.

Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2018, 18:00 PMTiger Baron

That's what I'm trying to do but I'm not exactly a moderator with the power to silence trolls.

Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2018, 03:12 AMNigelBallsworth

So I've been playing UKF quite a bit recently, and I'd like to challenge your assertion that they need to rely on, or rely on heavily, the mortar in large team games. I don't typically build this, as I see it as a waste of time and resources. Rather, there is some "carrying" that needs to be done by your team mates, but it's worth it if you preserve your troops, vet them up, and move toward armor at a brisk pace. With any luck, your allies can take the brunt while you do this, and you can in turn support them in the mid to late game.