Make all Loiter plane abilities a lined strafe
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Due to this the plane abilities will:
1. Require actual skill in when to use and where to place it. IE You can't just click where the enemy is and force them to back off for the given ability time.
2. Make end game plane abilities less dominant and effective against tanks/infantry
I feel like a good example of this is the Advanced Warfare Doc for Soviets. This doc had a strafe for the IL2 Sturmovik attacks instead of a loiter. While this ability is still strong it is much more situational when compared to the loitering.
Of course, some of the loiters would need to be patch/balanced to become a strafe, but I feel that this would help prevent planes from becoming too dominant in the late game.
Posts: 2145 | Subs: 2
Posts: 823 | Subs: 3
Posts: 515
Posts: 2742
Recon loiters aren't the worst thing in the world, especially in a game with things like offmap flares.
Although at the same time, only loiters really suffer from anti-air units. Single pass strafes tend to be able to deliver their payloads before being shot down, or at least much moreso in comparison to loiters. Loitering planes are exactly what AA units are meant for. (Their positioning should be to the side of the planes, not directly underneath them for them to be reliable.)
If, say, all loiters were changed to strafes, so all plane abilities were single pass, then there would have to be some kind of penalty for losing a plane. Say, a minutes long timer disabling ALL plane abilities for the player/team before cooldown.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
get anti air? Loiters are not much of a problem if you have anti air :-D
This.
Everything always is "overpowered" if you don't get counter to it.
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
The fact is loiters require almost no player input while basically being a full on assault on their own, denying large amounts of territory and normally causing a full on retreat.
Players can hope an AA unit will knock out the loiter but most of the time it is not reliable and you'll end up losing units waiting for the AA to do its job.
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Just because something can be countered doesn't make it good design. And even with counters I've seen loiters last their entire duration.
The fact is loiters have almost no player input while basically being a full on assault on their own, denying large amounts of territory and normally causing a full on retreat.
This.
Everything always is "overpowered" if you don't get counter to it.
This is my issue. I have no problem with a large CP late game air strike being strong IF it requires actual effort to use. Loiters are literally point and click abilities that require either micro out of the given area or a dedicated unit which costs both manpower and fuel (there are no cheap anti air). A lot of people complained about how auto fire mortars required no player input into it to be effective, but I feel the loiter planes are even a worse example of a lack of player input.
Also for most factions (with the exception of OKW) Anti air isnt a must build. The USF half track while good is a bitch to micro and most LT builds go m20 over it, Soviets don't have any Anti AIr, Ostheer will be forced to delay a p4 or stug for an Ostwind, and the british either tech for bofors instead of AEC or Centaur over Cromwell. All of which can set you back just a counter a commander ability. Yet if you dont get these the ability can very well change engagements for you.
tis true, if u micro ur flak ht and dont lose it like nub then it+t4 truck ez kill loiter plans
That's just for OKW though, what about Soviets, Ost, USF, or Brits who aren't required/given an anti air unit every game which, if built, could set back a generalist tank or in the soviets case don't have anti air?
Posts: 607
Posts: 264
besides you can just move your units out of the circle once you see that huge red mark on the minimap, you have plenty of time to move your units away, just like back in the day when you heard a land mattress fire or a stuka.
/Sarcasm.
+1 for wuff's answer
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
No, just no. I prefer to have my easy win button that denies a large part of the map for my opponent. It's also great fun to have the loiter planes attack the enemy while he is in his base, just to add insult to injury.
besides you can just move your units out of the circle once you see that huge red mark on the minimap, you have plenty of time to move your units away, just like back in the day when you heard a land mattress fire or a stuka.
/Sarcasm.
+1 for wuff's answer
The Solution is to make the zone larger
Posts: 98
While we are talking about large area denile, zero input, auto targeting abilities, are we gonna consider artillery based ones as well?
Sector arty, scavenge arty (forget its actual name), zeroing arty, close the pocket, covering arty, etc are all pretty much I win the engagement buttons.
Horrible as they are, skill planes can at least be shot down, but these abilities require the player to get the hell out of dodge, forcing you to loose valuable ground.
Posts: 587
/sarcasm
Posts: 98
"Just move out of the area"
/sarcasm
"Just hold on to your tin helmet."
/sarcasm
Posts: 587
"Just hold on to your tin helmet."
/sarcasm
"Just beat the enemy before he can deploy the planes"
/sarcasm
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
"Just beat the enemy before he can deploy the planes"
/sarcasm
Smoke and Flank the planes l2p
Posts: 264
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 29
Dedicated AA units (except the flakpanzer) are actually very good at shooting them down now.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
COH2 would be 10x better without this cancer.
Posts: 474
Livestreams
21 | |||||
17 | |||||
1045 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.1109614.644+10
- 4.608220.734+2
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Schrick
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM