Scott shouldn't survive more than 2 shots.

Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2017, 19:22 PMShadowLinkX37

Removal of the smoke screen as well as a projectile slow so you potentially dodge the shot would make it far less frustrating to play against.

Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2017, 19:16 PMMarioSilver

I think there was a good reason this unit had 320HP, so you wouldn't go too forward with it and wipe ATGs left and right.

It is highly accurate, is too lethal against 4-man units and got buffed multiple times patch after patch. It either needs its range reduced or should have its HP reverted back to 320HP.

Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2017, 19:40 PMsome one

You are one of those jucy OKW blober thats Scotts are really like to rekt

Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2017, 04:14 AMDanielD

By the time the Scott comes out you should be close to a panther or a PIV, if it got two shot it would be unusable as like someone said, cloaked raketen creep alone would counter it, or 1 raketen plus panther/piv/puma.

USF already struggles late game, I don't see a need to make it harder.

Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2017, 19:16 PMMarioSilver

I think there was a good reason this unit had 320HP, so you wouldn't go too forward with it and wipe ATGs left and right.

It is highly accurate, is too lethal against 4-man units and got buffed multiple times patch after patch. It either needs its range reduced or should have its HP reverted back to 320HP.

Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2017, 07:08 AMmiragefla

The reason for its health is due to the fact it needs to operate closer to the front than typical artillery. It's very good fire support which could use some tweaking in its one hit kill radius against infantry in exchange for increase mid-far AOE as well as buffing its barrages so they actually recharge without waiting a year. This would mean the M8 would not be reliant on direct hits for either wipes or just damage against infantry.

400 health is fine given every other light tank/light-tank esque vehicle sits around 400 and all come earlier than the M8 Scott. Unless this thing starts firing 105mm rounds, it's not lethal enough, except on RNG hits vs clumped squads, to be incredibly light weight for its price tag, tier and general need to sustain fire over the sudden bursts that rocket or heavier shell based artillery can deal.

USF does not need any more paper units considering their TD already goes up in 3 hits and USF has some of the largest target sizes for vehicles in the late game.

Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2017, 11:21 AMAceOfTitanium

It should have exacly the same armor and health of the stuart since it is basically a stuart with an open top turret and with a light howitzer.

To be honest I dont see the reason for usf to have a mortar, a pack howitzer and a howitzer motor carriage. It would be neat if the pack howitzer would be moved to the airborne commander instead of the at gun (maybe?) since in ww2 what gun was mostry used by paratroopers and/or the m8 scott would be moved to a armor/recon commander for the same reasons.

If the m8 scott was tied to a commander it woulnt be as annoying because you wouldnt see it as often and maybe it would make a less used commander worth the consideration.