Hi friends, CoH 2 Ded game and all but I would like to suggest a quick change on something thats been bugging me for awhile. Its the dang KV2!
Now we all know the kv2 is a Meme and is hardly ever played in 1v1s outside of a barton match but that got me thinking as to why?
The CP count as it stands is probably the highest heavy armor tank of its class, getting to the 14 CP takes ages and often times wont happen until you are either off the map or the game is simply over.
As such we should let this unit come into the fray a little earlier, a 13 CP count KV2 would do wonders.
The KV-2 as its stands already has a lot of drawbacks and would only open up the window for this unit be played or utilized.
TLDR: Bring KV-2 CP count to 13 (similar to is-2, tiger)
Bring KV-2 CP count down by 1
28 Apr 2017, 22:36 PM
#1
1 
Posts: 1276
28 Apr 2017, 23:01 PM
#2
Posts: 284 | Subs: 1
+1
it will be free vet if call it without proper supports.
it will be free vet if call it without proper supports.
29 Apr 2017, 05:43 AM
#3
Posts: 1216
I think it comes soon enough. The problem I see is that it's not worth the cost given what it is and how vulnerable to attacks it can be.
In my opinion, bringing it down might make it come sooner, but not any more relevant or useful.
In my opinion, bringing it down might make it come sooner, but not any more relevant or useful.
29 Apr 2017, 07:49 AM
#4
Posts: 1487
cps are not a factor in late game.
 | Playercard of eqdw | |||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
29 Apr 2017, 19:41 PM
#5
1 Posts: 1276
cps are not a factor in late game.
That comment makes no sense. You have to get to "late game" at some point. Whats a is2, tiger, jt, pershing?
The KV2 should be standardized with its cp requirement relative to other vehicles of its class.
Its such a simple argument yet you cant just agree lol.
29 Apr 2017, 20:24 PM
#6
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
I think KV-2 should be on 12 - CP, closest units are Stormtigr and AVRE - 12/11 CP
30 Apr 2017, 10:52 AM
#7
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Im Kv-2 should have:
1) lower CP
2) minimum range removed
3) vision penalty reduced or removed
4) target size penalty on switching modes removed
5) would even consider increasing limit to 2.
For the Doctrine I would consider bringing soviet industry back and allowing T4 to built without T3 allowing only t34 to build for increased price of 100 fuel until T3 was up.
Or having some bonuses for T34 if all building where built.
1) lower CP
2) minimum range removed
3) vision penalty reduced or removed
4) target size penalty on switching modes removed
5) would even consider increasing limit to 2.
For the Doctrine I would consider bringing soviet industry back and allowing T4 to built without T3 allowing only t34 to build for increased price of 100 fuel until T3 was up.
Or having some bonuses for T34 if all building where built.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
36 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.617222.735+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
823 users are online:
823 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49140
Welcome our newest member, Drummer
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Drummer
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM