GCS placement match stats (w/ updates)
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Posts: 1138 | Subs: 2
Posts: 550 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
Ost OKW Soviets USF Brits
Count 15 37 17 25 10
Wins: 10 25 3 11 3
Losses: 5 12 14 14 7
Win % 66,7% 67,6% 17,6% 44,0% 30,0%
Soviets looking pretty good there. Brits not too shabby either.
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
So if you take the games where both players won a game (so as to ignore matchups that might have been determined purely by skill gap), the win rates for factions are, assuming I didn't enter anything wrong:
Code
Ost OKW Soviets USF Brits
Count 15 37 17 25 10
Wins: 10 25 3 11 3
Losses: 5 12 14 14 7
Win % 66,7% 67,6% 17,6% 44,0% 30,0%
Soviets looking pretty good there. Brits not too shabby either.
dat Finnish sarcasm
Yeah allies OP as fuck and Axis super UP KAPPA
Irony off:
A) because of the WBP, you see it allready in automatch search: 70-80% axis in 1vs1 to 4vs4. And now with the GCS Mod as well.
B) Also its about the 4 maps. They are quite good for axis. Maps are an important part in Balancing and how axis vs allies is!
Posts: 2066
Posts: 2066
Soviets seemsgood man lol
Posts: 1954
Yeah allies OP as fuck and Axis super UP KAPPA
Irony off:
A) because of the WBP, you see it allready in automatch search: 70-80% axis in 1vs1 to 4vs4. And now with the GCS Mod as well.
B) Also its about the 4 maps. They are quite good for axis. Maps are an important part in Balancing and how axis vs allies is!
When sorted by maps with the same data excluded, matches where one player won both matches, the one map that stood out was Crossing in the Woods. It should have been excluded from the pool.
Disclaimer: I didn't bother updating in the last two days, but quick scan looks like nothing unchanged.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
OKW is now the dominating faction vs everything. Their infantry is still too strong.
You have the best starting unit, Volks that can very well trade with any other more expensive infantry and obers that are really good.
I have seen blob of one of each lately and they are all lethal and cost effectif.
Posts: 1138 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1138 | Subs: 2
Posts: 276
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Posts: 550 | Subs: 1
Look like brits and soviets won´t deal problems anymore. Now you can finally see that whole allied side was winning games only because of their cheese and they are actually badly designed and stand no chance against better designed axis factions once you remove their cheese.
OKW and "well designed faction" are two things that cannot physically be in the same sentence. The only well designed factions are and have always been Ostheer and Soviets.
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
OKW and "well designed faction" are two things that cannot physically be in the same sentence. The only well designed factions are and have always been Ostheer and Soviets.
Sorry I forget it´s well designed faction and OPKW
Posts: 1954
Look like brits and soviets won´t deal problems anymore. Now you can finally see that whole allied side was winning games only because of their cheese and they are actually badly designed and stand no chance against better designed axis factions once you remove their cheese.
COH2 would've been better if all factions were designed with T0 having infantry, T1 & T2 being team weapons or light vehicles, T3 for regular vehicles (P4, Cromwell, Sherman) and T4 for advanced. Trying to make 4 equal to 3 across multiple factions is a recipe for what we have right now.
If penal flamers were still around, Soviet win rates would have looked like the Ost win rates.
Posts: 1138 | Subs: 2
Livestreams
9 | |||||
34 | |||||
12 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger