m8 priority
2 Apr 2017, 17:26 PM
#1
Posts: 1158
Seems like this unit is prioritizing vehicles, which it usually cannot penetrate. This should be changed to prioritizing infantry, or even better giving AI units an infantry only toggle.
29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
2 Apr 2017, 21:35 PM
#2
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
i found it pen enough to make difference. i had more than handful of times when i chased away anything bigger and equal to puma/p2 by itself and p4+ in conjunction with other AT support.
so i dont think its a problem.
so i dont think its a problem.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
2 Apr 2017, 21:42 PM
#3
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Micro the crap out of it!
Seriously, it's a good unit, it will reward you if you micro it.
Seriously, it's a good unit, it will reward you if you micro it.
2 Apr 2017, 21:48 PM
#4
Posts: 4928
Micro the crap out of it!
Seriously, it's a good unit, it will reward you if you micro it.
The problem with it is the micro required to make up for it's deficiencies is better used on a more competent vehicle.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
2 Apr 2017, 22:27 PM
#5
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
The problem with it is the micro required to make up for it's deficiencies is better used on a more competent vehicle.
The Scott is cheap an a very annoying little thing, perfect to setup baits when it hits Vet1 for it's own "Tactician" smoke.
2 Apr 2017, 23:51 PM
#6
Posts: 4928
The Scott is cheap an a very annoying little thing, perfect to setup baits when it hits Vet1 for it's own "Tactician" smoke.
Oh, I thought we were talking about the Greyhound
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
3 Apr 2017, 00:05 AM
#7
Posts: 766 | Subs: 2
Oh, I thought we were talking about the Greyhound
Well at least there is not a half dozen like M1.
3 Apr 2017, 00:24 AM
#8
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Oh, I thought we were talking about the Greyhound
I enjoy spicing things out away from the Heavy Cavalry US build, but not even I would use Recon Company, it has no purpose besides roleplaying.
3 Apr 2017, 00:29 AM
#9
Posts: 766 | Subs: 2
I enjoy spicing things out away from the Heavy Cavalry US build, but not even I would use Recon Company, it has no purpose besides roleplaying.
The Greyhound can be quite nice for a Lieutenant build so you can deploy something similar to a Stuart so you can also deploy M2B HMGs. But, other than that it is pretty bad.
3 Apr 2017, 03:25 AM
#10
Posts: 1954
The Greyhound can be quite nice for a Lieutenant build so you can deploy something similar to a Stuart so you can also deploy M2B HMGs. But, other than that it is pretty bad.
It still has the problem that it loses badly to a 222, even with the 70 munition armor upgrade. The upgrade should be included in the basic cost, and it would have been better if they gave it something else when they nerfed canister shot into oblivion. Maybe give it passive capping or the ability to lay the general purpose mines.
3 Apr 2017, 04:00 AM
#11
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
It still has the problem that it loses badly to a 222, even with the 70 munition armor upgrade. The upgrade should be included in the basic cost, and it would have been better if they gave it something else when they nerfed canister shot into oblivion. Maybe give it passive capping or the ability to lay the general purpose mines.
Sadly, the Greyhound had it's fair share of Glory in vCoH, I don't think the Recon M8 will ever be as epic as the old one.
3 Apr 2017, 06:09 AM
#12
Posts: 4928
I'd like if they took the Greyhound and rebalanced it like the old T-70, high risk, high reward.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
3 Apr 2017, 09:46 AM
#13
Posts: 766 | Subs: 2
It still has the problem that it loses badly to a 222, even with the 70 munition armor upgrade. The upgrade should be included in the basic cost, and it would have been better if they gave it something else when they nerfed canister shot into oblivion. Maybe give it passive capping or the ability to lay the general purpose mines.
I have experimenting around with a change ammo ability like a Sherman. Fires buffed vs vehicle ap rounds that do crap vs infantry. And, then make the canister shot into a firing mode, adjusted the values so it does reliable anti infantry but crap vs vehicles.
I'd like if they took the Greyhound and rebalanced it like the old T-70, high risk, high reward.
Too much squad wiping then.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
174 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.581231.716+6
- 2.816222.786+22
- 3.34657.859+11
- 4.635.926+4
- 5.15538.803-1
- 6.883583.602-1
- 7.440154.741+2
- 8.1072610.637+5
- 9.287111.721+3
- 10.8120.802+3
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
966
Board Info
553 users are online:
553 guests
0 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
42 posts in the last month
3 posts in the last week
42 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48175
Welcome our newest member, sunwindiscount
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, sunwindiscount
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM