Future Balance Patch Teasers
Posts: 223
https://github.com/xxpatch/xxpatch/find/master(this is the link to the source files)
Mr.Smith's post to the source files:
https://www.coh2.org/topic/59906/to-all-modders-migrating-mods-to-post-wbp/page/1#post_id600057
Posts: 368
https://github.com/xxpatch/gcspatch
is what they're cooking next. Note the name.
I am sure someone will dig through everything for specific values, but you can already tell what's in scope ( ) by stuff it says here and there.
Posts: 2885
I am sure someone will dig through everything for specific values, but you can already tell what's in scope ( ) by file descriptions.
Btw these are the names of last commit not file descriptions just fyi.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 223
1. Fix for Sappers and Rear Echelon Flamers? (Not sure what's wrong)
2. Add hold fire for most tanks heavy and medium.
3. Arty cover got changed. Not sure what exactly without opening the file itself.
4. Comet WP DOT changed. Probably a fat nerf.
5. Land Mattress got DM change. Not sure what DM is exactly.
6. Maxim is going to be changed in number of squad members it seems.
EDIT:
7. Default prioritise vehicles for all AT guns thank god.
Posts: 818
So far I looked at the file descriptions:
1. Fix for Sappers and Rear Echelon Flamers? (Not sure what's wrong)
2. Add hold fire for most tanks heavy and medium.
3. Arty cover got changed. Not sure what exactly without opening the file itself.
4. Comet WP DOT changed. Probably a fat nerf.
5. Land Mattress got DM change. Not sure what DM is exactly.
6. Maxim is going to be changed in number of squad members it seems.
EDIT:
7. Default prioritise vehicles for all AT guns thank god.
Default prioritize would be great for jacksons and m10s which reset everytime you exit the vehicle
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
1. Fix for Sappers and Rear Echelon Flamers? (Not sure what's wrong)
The UK built a university and researched flamethrower +2. They are also weightless and can be combined with other upgrades without magical restrictions.
USF is stuck with flamethrower +1. Not as strong as UKF but they still bypass equipment restrictions.
https://www.coh2.org/topic/51073/sappers-flamethrower-damage-against-cover #scope
PD: i want a scope emoji for the forums now.
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
So far I looked at the file descriptions:
1. Fix for Sappers and Rear Echelon Flamers? (Not sure what's wrong)
2. Add hold fire for most tanks heavy and medium.
3. Arty cover got changed. Not sure what exactly without opening the file itself.
4. Comet WP DOT changed. Probably a fat nerf.
5. Land Mattress got DM change. Not sure what DM is exactly.
6. Maxim is going to be changed in number of squad members it seems.
EDIT:
7. Default prioritise vehicles for all AT guns thank god.
DM is probably damage.
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2066
what is all the time the thing with the comet WP? the problem is the armor...
It can kill and has insane range. Agreed, the comet needs an armor nerf and either AI potency nerf or an AT potency nerf. Can't the elitist jack on steroids of all trades.
Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Leave everything about the comet as is, but nerf the armour so that Stugs can fight them and panthers pen most of the time and you get a balanced tank... a jackson with an all-round gun. unique tank with a weakness... perfect.
nice idea, why no one thought about it before
but therňn we need to tone down stugie
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedPosts: 612 | Subs: 1
nice idea, why no one thought about it before
but therňn we need to tone down stugie
Don't know if sarcastic Kappa
Well the Stug's damage over time is pretty fecking good but I'm not sure it needs a nerf.
Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
But where cons buff where is-2 and tiger buff where OKW nerf where kv-8 change where where where .
Cons don't need a buff...
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Don't know if sarcastic Kappa
Well the Stug's damage over time is pretty fecking good but I'm not sure it needs a nerf.
I´m not sarcastic.
Stug needs a nerf, at least slight now. It´ rof is too high right now imo
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned
Cons don't need a buff...
Frost talk same, but after few games vs OKW he change his opinion .
Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
I´m not sarcastic.
Stug needs a nerf, at least slight now. It´ rof is too high right now imo
Ah well i have been saying it for a while, guess just never enough
Well i think you can only nerf the stug if it comes with a nerf to Cromwell and t-34/76. And if you nerf ROF i think you would need to increase its pen... But then why would anyone get a panther...
Maybe it would be better to adjust its vet bonus's so it doesn't become so mental (I might have the vet bonus's wrong i cant remember them)
Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
Frost talk same, but after few games vs OKW he change his opinion .
hmm but Cons were never meant to be used in isolation but as supporting units, with maxims or penals or guards or shocks to into fast tanks.
Have you used them with the PPSH upgrade? They are really good and remember they are really cheap...
Would you be okay with them having a performance increase for a cost increase?
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently Banned
hmm but Cons were never meant to be used in isolation but as supporting units, with maxims or penals or guards or shocks to into fast tanks.
Have you used them with the PPSH upgrade? They are really good and remember they are really cheap...
Would you be okay with them having a performance increase for a cost increase?
You say penals ? Problem now that before it was to OP but now, with MP price its a hard, i mean sviet game based on MP.
PPSH work only on some map. Cheap ? Tell me how many cost gevers and STG , in what CP thay are compared to ppsh .
Maybe change cost is a thing.
Livestreams
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.883398.689+5
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, may88forex
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM