Sherman sweeper was better, not only swept mines but also shred nazis
Sorry for the
yeah the one with the chains lol, insane!
Posts: 2066
Sherman sweeper was better, not only swept mines but also shred nazis
Sorry for the
Posts: 935
Posts: 327
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
.
Posts: 50
The argument is more along the lines that the Comet and Cromwell need to be adjusted to allow for room for the Churchill to be viable. At the moment there it no point in getting a Churchill when you can get a Comet that bounced 88 rounds, one shots squads, and has a great gun while also being nimble as hell and great for diving with the hammer engine boost.
Posts: 453
Posts: 466
Posts: 67
Posts: 380
Posts: 808
Posts: 440
Posts: 808
Nerfing comet will not help church get better
Posts: 466
and its main gun is already effective vs infantry and it also has decent pen for AT.
Posts: 2
Posts: 67
Yes it will, if comet wernt so good, we will be seeing some nice Armour combos such as firefly in combination with Churchill
Posts: 50
Yes it will, if comet wernt so good, we will be seeing some nice Armour combos such as firefly in combination with Churchill
Posts: 50
How about removing Comets and making them doctrinal? I always felt relic added them to the brits just to make them really worth the bucks you paid...
Imo UKF could have all tank-tools they need, if everything worked as it should: Centaur AI, Cromwell good medium, Firefly AT and Churchill infantry support.
I too think, the smoke ability shouldn't cripple the Churchills movement and it could actually be worth the while (and the cost) in its supporting role.
Posts: 67
Posts: 50
I would give Comet lackluster penetration, it gives breathing room for firefly. Comet would still work great in flanks due heavy tank rear armor nerfs. Comet for flanking attack and Churchill for frontal assault.
41 | |||||
5 |