British Turtle Much
Posts: 49
To lighten this issue 2 modifications must be made:
1) Reduce the range of the double mortars, cause they can safely attack victory points without losing a single soldier.
2) Remove the Bofors gun artillery ability. As if twin mortars weren't enough we have to deal with more artillery!
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 99
Posts: 49
Why does people rage post on forums when they lost a match? I'll never understand.
I win most matches...this is no rage post. I just want the British to not just be a defensive army, it's boring.
Posts: 1930
Posts: 871
Why does people rage post on forums when they lost a match? I'll never understand.
Because people would rather believe they lost because X ability or X faction is OP and needs nerfing, rather than realising they probably lost because either their opponent was better or they made mistakes.
Posts: 49
Because people would rather believe they lost because X ability or X faction is OP and needs nerfing, rather than realising they probably lost because either their opponent was better or they made mistakes.
Again...I wreck British most of the times. I want to play as them as and not be forced to go defensive because going non-defense is counter productive. Try being less narrow minded...
Posts: 278
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Again...I wreck British most of the times. I want to play as them as and not be forced to go defensive because going non-defense is counter productive. Try being less narrow minded...
Nobody is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to play defensively. Just tech AEC and get some commandos instead of a mortar pit.
Posts: 401
Posts: 871
Again...I wreck British most of the times. I want to play as them as and not be forced to go defensive because going non-defense is counter productive. Try being less narrow minded...
I think it is you who is narrow minded believing you are forced into playing defensively as Brits. Your post would make much more sense if you were having issues with emplacements.
If you are having problems with Brits when not building emplacements then either:
Post some replays of games where you are having problems so people can help you improve.
or
Perhaps at your ladder ranking, people struggle to counter emplacements properly and so it appears that playing with emplacements is the only way.
Posts: 7
Because they lose solely because other dude hacked or was using OP shit, never before player in question actually sucks donkey balls to the point where a kitten playing with the pc mouse would outplay him.
Long time lurker, first time poster. Just wanted to thank you for your elegant response to the op, simply beautiful.
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1072
I win most matches...this is no rage post. I just want the British to not just be a defensive army, it's boring.
Then dont make emplacements. Make infantry tanks commandoes 6pdrs, snipers, sappers, Vickers, AECs
Posts: 1072
Because they lose solely because other dude hacked or was using OP shit, never before player in question actually sucks donkey balls to the point where a kitten playing with the pc mouse would outplay him.
Some things are better left unsaid.
Posts: 179
Some things are better left unsaid.
Then what's the fun in it?
There are many QQ threads that are actually serious and should be looked at, but there are just as many that are the complete opposite.
Posts: 1072
Then what's the fun in it?
There are many QQ threads that are actually serious and should be looked at, but there are just as many that are the complete opposite.
Then just ignore it instead of insulting the dude out of our already dying player base.
Livestreams
150 | |||||
15 | |||||
7 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
6 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Xclusive
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM