Maybe its to keep OKW's early game more agressive and not as defensive as Ostheer.
Pretty much.
Volks are stronger then grens early game after all.
Posts: 17913 | Subs: 8
Maybe its to keep OKW's early game more agressive and not as defensive as Ostheer.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1740
Pretty much.
Volks are stronger then grens early game after all.
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
Posts: 1217
Posts: 53
Played two games so it is a bit early to come to a conclusion.
Though I did lose a Tiger to T-34 spam in a situation where I shouldn´t have lost the Tiger. Keeping the frontal armor at the T-34s and driving backwards and having a Pak behind. The Pak was killed almost instantly by the coax MGs + shots and the Tiger simply couldn´t handle the T-34s which penetrated way too often.
Guess I should try StuG spam.
Posts: 1217
Three. The moment they reached the sides the Tiger was done.
How many t34-76 were there?
Posts: 96
Posts: 1653
new OKW dont need no doctrinal MG
Posts: 30
mg42 call in need to be changed to tank buster squad with panzerschreck.
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Three. The moment they reached the sides the Tiger was done.
Posts: 345
Three. The moment they reached the sides the Tiger was done.
Posts: 1740
+1
Or something else. I can't understand the point of having two kinds of MGs
Posts: 959
i actually dont really see a reason to play ostheer anymore, the only thing they do objectively better is the sniper, and arguably the mortar. okw has access to better infantry, a slightly weaker mg, and has access to the same mg doctrinally, better elite infantry, better tanks, 5 levels of vet, etc.
Posts: 959
Also, I don't understand why OKW can't get MG34 until after you get a truck. It prevents OKW from having flexible openings and build orders. It makes no sense since Brits and Wehr can get superior MG's instantly, why not OKW?
Posts: 49
Posts: 824
Posts: 17913 | Subs: 8
It's the same for the russians, one is available all the time (Maxim), while the other one is stronger (DSHka).
Posts: 304
give fowardtruck of okw to every faction and give free infantry when tech-up to every faction. No!
literally because asymmetrical design. why cant soviets/usf get an mg from the start?
Posts: 97
i actually dont really see a reason to play ostheer anymore, the only thing they do objectively better is the sniper, and arguably the mortar. okw has access to better infantry, a slightly weaker mg, and has access to the same mg doctrinally, better elite infantry, better tanks, 5 levels of vet, etc.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
69 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
59 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
27 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |