What do you think about The SPEED of COH 2 ?
12 Mar 2016, 23:03 PM
#1
Posts: 137
Please respond. Thx.
12 Mar 2016, 23:30 PM
#2
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
I'm going to need a bit of elaboration on what you mean by speed to comment.
The time it takes for combat to be resolved?
The time it takes for teching up and getting advanced units?
The time it takes for units to move around the map?
The time it takes for downtimes to end to start up another fight?
The time it takes for combat to be resolved?
The time it takes for teching up and getting advanced units?
The time it takes for units to move around the map?
The time it takes for downtimes to end to start up another fight?
13 Mar 2016, 00:09 AM
#3
Posts: 609
Pacing, combat etc. all seem fine to me. The only issue is retreat times for Ost/Sovs on larger 4v4 maps.
13 Mar 2016, 00:38 AM
#4
Posts: 137
I'm going to need a bit of elaboration on what you mean by speed to comment.
The time it takes for combat to be resolved?
The time it takes for teching up and getting advanced units?
The time it takes for units to move around the map?
The time it takes for downtimes to end to start up another fight?
The time it takes for teching up and getting advanced units AND The time it takes for units to move around the map. The pace of the game it seems to FAST. Alot of things happen in the same time.
13 Mar 2016, 01:43 AM
#5
Posts: 2742
The larger the game, the more players, the faster the pacing goes.
In big team games people can often straight up skip the early game. A fourth teammate can do nothing but build OPs for the first few minutes of the game, which is often worth more than throwing manpower at holding a single fuel point or VP for a few total minutes.
This leads to Panthers coming out before command tanks or the ostheer doctrinal puma can be fielded, even.
In 1v1s, things seem a bit more smooth, with less variables and all.
In big team games people can often straight up skip the early game. A fourth teammate can do nothing but build OPs for the first few minutes of the game, which is often worth more than throwing manpower at holding a single fuel point or VP for a few total minutes.
This leads to Panthers coming out before command tanks or the ostheer doctrinal puma can be fielded, even.
In 1v1s, things seem a bit more smooth, with less variables and all.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
13 Mar 2016, 02:32 AM
#6
Posts: 960
It's fine? Not really sure what you're looking for. About the only complaint I could make is that the transition from mid to late game in 2v2s is a bit on the fast side.
3's and 4's are just insane, but there's no real point talking about those.
3's and 4's are just insane, but there's no real point talking about those.
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
13 Mar 2016, 02:50 AM
#7
Posts: 73
I wish that games wouldn't take quite so long. I feel like it'd be less stressful to be invested in a ten or twenty minute game rather than a forty minute game, but I do respect that the pacing is a large part of what makes up CoH2's identity. I wouldn't go so far as to call for changes, but it would be nice if I didn't feel like I had to be in a really good state of mind just to play.
13 Mar 2016, 12:02 PM
#8
1 
Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
i think pacing in 1v1 is fine, in 2v2 a little too fast, and 3v3+ needs a serious reduction in fuel income
“Ha! They're scratching your paint job, Helmut!”
13 Mar 2016, 12:03 PM
#9
Posts: 137
I wish that games wouldn't take quite so long. I feel like it'd be less stressful to be invested in a ten or twenty minute game rather than a forty minute game, but I do respect that the pacing is a large part of what makes up CoH2's identity. I wouldn't go so far as to call for changes, but it would be nice if I didn't feel like I had to be in a really good state of mind just to play.
Yes. I feel that the game is to competitive...has a very pro gameplay...that's the problem !
13 Mar 2016, 12:29 PM
#10
Posts: 587
Yes. I feel that the game is to competitive...has a very pro gameplay...that's the problem !
Please be joking... Ah what the heck, knowing this community you're probably sincere.
Game too competitive being a problem is beyond aaa stupidity.
Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
13 Mar 2016, 16:30 PM
#11
Posts: 137
Please be joking... Ah what the heck, knowing this community you're probably sincere.
Game too competitive being a problem is beyond aaa stupidity.
That's your opinion...i will retain mine !
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
107 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
885 | ||
 |
|
|
49 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.623225.735+1
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.919405.694+3
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
768 users are online:
768 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49149
Welcome our newest member, Yeatonks
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Yeatonks
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM