Does anyone use Rangers, when Rifles perform quite well at the same thing, which is AI? 400MP and 100 Muni seems quite steep for such a fragile unit.
Is there any scope (hope) that they could come standard with zooks, then they might be a little more versatile?
Are Rangers worth it?
8 Mar 2016, 23:11 PM
#1
Posts: 394
Porygon Wrote:
I don't like Soviet neither, but please cake, just fuck off back to the official noob forum.
Vetlolcake:
Should i just attack move to get there? I might get there easier. Like sovs do
I don't like Soviet neither, but please cake, just fuck off back to the official noob forum.
Vetlolcake:
Should i just attack move to get there? I might get there easier. Like sovs do
8 Mar 2016, 23:17 PM
#2
Posts: 640
They work better on maps which have a lot of close quarters combat. On those maps they murder everything. In long range maps, you're better off with M1919 paras if you want to use elite infantry or just BAR riflemen.
8 Mar 2016, 23:20 PM
#3
Posts: 47
Did you know, Rangers can also get weapons from the rack, and can carry 3. Did you know I once destroyed 2 KT's and 1 JT in one go. with 3 rangers and a sergeant carrying in total of 11 bazookas. It was hilarous
8 Mar 2016, 23:23 PM
#4
Posts: 394
Did you know, Rangers can also get weapons from the rack, and can carry 3. Did you know I once destroyed 2 KT's and 1 JT in one go. with 3 rangers and a sergeant carrying in total of 11 bazookas. It was hilarous
How many weapons can they carry if upgraded with Thompsons?
Porygon Wrote:
I don't like Soviet neither, but please cake, just fuck off back to the official noob forum.
Vetlolcake:
Should i just attack move to get there? I might get there easier. Like sovs do
I don't like Soviet neither, but please cake, just fuck off back to the official noob forum.
Vetlolcake:
Should i just attack move to get there? I might get there easier. Like sovs do
8 Mar 2016, 23:24 PM
#5
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
How many weapons can they carry if upgraded with Thompsons?
I don't have em', but I'm pretty sure the Thompsons take up all of the slots.
8 Mar 2016, 23:27 PM
#6
Posts: 47
How many weapons can they carry if upgraded with Thompsons?
Its a choice, its either 3 weapons from the rack, or 3 Thompsons. So far I noticed if you have 2 weapons from the rack you can still upgrade to Thompsons, but when having 3 weapons from rack Thompson upgrade is blocked. When you do have 2 weapons from the rack and do the Thompson upgrade. I dunno what will happen, never did it myself
8 Mar 2016, 23:35 PM
#7
Posts: 19
I haven't tried rangers since they were on the free to play rotation but i think you can upgrade them to thompsons and still pick up 1 weapon from the ground/weapon racks
SteamId is set to private for user id Illenia. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
8 Mar 2016, 23:39 PM
#8
Posts: 8
I haven't tried rangers since they were on the free to play rotation but i think you can upgrade them to thompsons and still pick up 1 weapon from the ground/weapon racks
I play them frequently, and yes, this is true.
9 Mar 2016, 00:41 AM
#9
Posts: 210
Does anyone use Rangers, when Rifles perform quite well at the same thing, which is AI? 400MP and 100 Muni seems quite steep for such a fragile unit.
Is there any scope (hope) that they could come standard with zooks, then they might be a little more versatile?
Rifles are better at long range. Rangers are better at close range, obviously. Yes, they perform quite well for their cost. If you want a volk shreck blob wiped, just get a ranger squad. Rifle are good, but they will rarely ever wipe any squads if the opponent has good micro.
Rangers can just chew apart anything that doesn't hit retreat by the time they're in their face.
9 Mar 2016, 02:41 AM
#10
7 
Posts: 1664
Riflemen have a target size of .97 while Ranger have .8 and they also regenerate health outside of combat at veterancy two.
Other than that I think they're a total bullshit unit. All they do is throw a standard grenade and get Thompsons... Wow Relic, you really went deep in the think tank coming up with this P2W commander
They are totally generic and uninspired and their unit description labels them as "marksmanship experts" while they spawn with M1 Carbines and can get Thompsons.
I would say Paratroopers are strictly better, but they have a target size of one which can be rough.
Other than that I think they're a total bullshit unit. All they do is throw a standard grenade and get Thompsons... Wow Relic, you really went deep in the think tank coming up with this P2W commander
They are totally generic and uninspired and their unit description labels them as "marksmanship experts" while they spawn with M1 Carbines and can get Thompsons.
I would say Paratroopers are strictly better, but they have a target size of one which can be rough.
9 Mar 2016, 02:45 AM
#11
Posts: 320
A squad of them can be really useful. If you get more then 1 you may be asking to get suppressed and shot down from long range. Using 1 as a flanker or a decap unit is strong.
9 Mar 2016, 03:00 AM
#12
Posts: 78
Riflemen have a target size of .97 while Ranger have .8 and they also regenerate health outside of combat at veterancy two.
Other than that I think they're a total bullshit unit. All they do is throw a standard grenade and get Thompsons... Wow Relic, you really went deep in the think tank coming up with this P2W commander
They are totally generic and uninspired and their unit description labels them as "marksmanship experts" while they spawn with M1 Carbines and can get Thompsons.
I would say Paratroopers are strictly better, but they have a target size of one which can be rough.
The thing is, rangers are inside a good overall commander (pershing, bunkers, mines, rangers) and the para's are in an overall bad commander.. I would've used para's if there were other options beside Airborne.
9 Mar 2016, 03:03 AM
#13
Posts: 238
How many weapons can they carry if upgraded with Thompsons?
with Thompsons there is 1 slot open left, for a BAR or ZOOK
9 Mar 2016, 03:07 AM
#14
Posts: 1124
They are good. Everyone stopped using them cuz of the calliope commander...
9 Mar 2016, 18:43 PM
#15
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
All they do is throw a standard grenade and get Thompsons
They are totally generic and uninspired and their unit description labels them as "marksmanship experts" while they spawn with M1 Carbines and can get Thompsons.
I would say Paratroopers are strictly better, but they have a target size of one which can be rough.
The thing is, rangers are inside a good overall commander (pershing, bunkers, mines, rangers) and the para's are in an overall bad commander.. I would've used para's if there were other options beside Airborne.
Both of this statements.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
10 Mar 2016, 01:06 AM
#16
Posts: 210
Riflemen have a target size of .97 while Ranger have .8 and they also regenerate health outside of combat at veterancy two.
Other than that I think they're a total bullshit unit. All they do is throw a standard grenade and get Thompsons... Wow Relic, you really went deep in the think tank coming up with this P2W commander
They are totally generic and uninspired and their unit description labels them as "marksmanship experts" while they spawn with M1 Carbines and can get Thompsons.
I would say Paratroopers are strictly better, but they have a target size of one which can be rough.
I used to think Para's were better than Rangers, but then I realized Rangers reinforce around 3 times faster than a Para squad.
10 Mar 2016, 02:14 AM
#17
7 Posts: 1664
I used to think Para's were better than Rangers, but then I realized Rangers reinforce around 3 times faster than a Para squad.
Paras can reinforce from beacons though.
Paratroopers are to Panzerfusiliers as Fallschirmjäger are to Rangers. In fact, I find Breakthrough and Airborne quite similar in that they both have an awesome infantry unit to fill wholes in your composition and a strong late game ability... and nothing else. (Jagd Tiger aside
)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
65 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
|
41 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.624225.735+2
- 5.920405.694+4
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
691 users are online:
691 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49152
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM