Login

russian armor

JU-87 vs P-47

17 Feb 2016, 16:01 PM
#1
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Relic, please.

Churchill



IS2



Jadgtiger



Kingtiger



Tiger

17 Feb 2016, 16:05 PM
#2
avatar of pugzii

Posts: 513

Yeah its worse and it costs more... also try it when they are moving, JU-87 is still accurate as fuck while rockets go fucking all over the place.
17 Feb 2016, 16:08 PM
#3
avatar of boc120

Posts: 245

Yes, I agree that this is a problem.
17 Feb 2016, 16:09 PM
#4
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Feb 2016, 16:05 PMpugzii
Yeah its worse and it costs more... also try it when they are moving, JU-87 is still accurate as fuck while rockets go fucking all over the place.


Notice on JU screens how small is area with burned ground around and compare to the holes after rockets. It looks awesome on Churchill's screen. Holes after rockets are like "3 Churchills" further.
17 Feb 2016, 16:25 PM
#5
avatar of ItchyGonorrhea

Posts: 107

I'd like to see how the Typhoon Strafe compares to these two.
17 Feb 2016, 16:25 PM
#6
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
I can understand, why ju-87 are so bugged, better and why this thing have so accuracy when tanks move.
17 Feb 2016, 16:27 PM
#7
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

JU87 is fine now that it no longer targets infantry (not taking into account the bug where it stays for 3 minutes, that still needs to be fixed). The P47 needs am accuracy buff. It can't even properly hit stationary vehicles. I've seen whole volleys landing left and right of a stationary P4, not dealing any damage
17 Feb 2016, 16:31 PM
#8
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

P-47 needs smaller distance between rockets so they don't land left and right next to target.

By the way, during tests, JU-87s once have stayed in the air for 20sec longer than ability lasts.
17 Feb 2016, 16:50 PM
#9
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

P-47 was definitely overnerfed. I hardly see airborne at all anymore.
17 Feb 2016, 17:08 PM
#10
avatar of SupremeStefan

Posts: 1220

one big fucking joke.. poor shity USF as always if something isnt riflmen its sux :foreveralone:
17 Feb 2016, 17:18 PM
#11
avatar of Skabinsk

Posts: 238

I like this thread, this is a serious issue.
17 Feb 2016, 17:47 PM
#12
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

That for proving my obsrvations P47s are able to kill the heaviest only if you hit them and snare. The result is guarateed wipe. Nowdays need vision thou.

ANd it is absolutly uslees vs med or light targets.

Topic starter would you be so kind to put here results of the next tests:

P47s
Vs P4
vs jpz4
vs pz2
vs Stuka
vs halftrack 251
vs Pzwerfer
17 Feb 2016, 17:50 PM
#13
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

That for proving my obsrvations P47s are able to kill the heaviest only if you hit them and snare. The result is guarateed wipe. Nowdays need vision thou.

ANd it is absolutly uslees vs med or light targets.

Topic starter would you be so kind to put here results of the next tests:

P47s
Vs P4
vs jpz4
vs pz2
vs Stuka
vs halftrack 251
vs Pzwerfer


Well, I can guess for now, that all of them will survive due to small target size, so rockets won't hit them at all :foreveralone:
17 Feb 2016, 18:40 PM
#14
avatar of Skabinsk

Posts: 238

People would cry is P-47s killed anything. Don't forget that they dont hit anything on the move or medium or light vehicles due to the small target size.
17 Feb 2016, 18:44 PM
#15
avatar of boc120

Posts: 245

Yes, the bug where the JUs stay around a long long time also needs to be fixed!
17 Feb 2016, 18:53 PM
#16
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17

Wow! Nice thread.

I knew that the JU-87 was near-godlike, but I never expected it to be THAT good.

I also knew that P-47 was trash, but not THAT bad. I usually attributed that to tank movement and/or the omnipresent OKW flak defences. Now I know I'm never using that ability again.

I'd like to see how the Typhoon Strafe compares to these two.

+1

(off-topic)
What's the best AA unit that Soviets have to shut down skillplanes? (the Soviet AA half-truck does garden-all)
(for USF I found the m20 to be the best AA unit)
17 Feb 2016, 19:10 PM
#17
avatar of PencilBatRation

Posts: 794

JU87 is fine, P47 sucks.


And how do we confirm that those pictures are not from a custom mod?
17 Feb 2016, 19:22 PM
#18
avatar of Olekman
Modmaker Badge

Posts: 208

Didn't P-47s have their accuracy nerfed like 9 months ago because they were apparently overperforming?

I remember times when Airborne Company was default pick for USF when Captain tier wasn't as good as it is now and it also had a solid late game anti-tank option with the P-47 loiter. Back then it was really useful against heavy tanks, less so against mediums because their speed allowed them to dodge rockets and quickly leave the target area.

Now, every time I see it, it does garbage damage.
17 Feb 2016, 21:19 PM
#19
avatar of Grim

Posts: 1096



Well, I can guess for now, that all of them will survive due to small target size, so rockets won't hit them at all :foreveralone:


can you test it on the pershing for the lulz?

I agree this ability needs adjusting......
17 Feb 2016, 21:23 PM
#20
avatar of ItchyGonorrhea

Posts: 107



+1



Tested it earlier. Seems even less powerful than P47. Out of 4 times, it only brought a KT below 50% one. Usually missed a lot with the rockets.

It does wreck infantry though. So I think it's okay.

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 2
unknown 1
Germany 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

740 users are online: 740 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49860
Welcome our newest member, Tham40570
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM