OKW got all this very good abilities for a very specific reason. They had resource penalties
Incorrect assumption. Also could you please explain why okw is doing so bad when it's so OP?
Posts: 500
OKW got all this very good abilities for a very specific reason. They had resource penalties
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 930
Posts: 154
Posts: 823 | Subs: 3
I really think that this is unfair and also gives a very strong faction a lot more power.
Rakettens and JP (and maybe also other units, not sure) can always be cloaked, even in red cover.
Let the "conversation" begin
Posts: 444
Posts: 1355
Incorrect assumption. Also could you please explain why okw is doing so bad when it's so OP?
Posts: 1248
At vet 2 or 3 it gets the same range as a normal AT gun. With vet the reketen is a super good AT platform.
Posts: 1653
Posts: 665
this is a straight up lie. OKW crews for some reason are way more durable than from any other
factions. LeIG crews are the worst offenders, they just shrug off small arms fire and grenades like they were firecrackers.
lately I found out that as a allied player I go 100% of times after the raketen for stealing purposes. I remember the last time I used one in 1v1 and I killed a KT with one raketen+ at nade, since the raketen penetrated EVERY shot. Right now they are just better than the PaK because of damage, mobility, stealth and retreat. And you can even put them on houses! oh wow.
Posts: 875 | Subs: 2
1-JPIV cautious movement should match P2 detection range.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So raketen range is lower than sight range of all vehicles, without it raketen would be useless again
Posts: 320
Posts: 98
This is balanced by Raketens having low range and DPS compared to other AT guns, and JP4 being the most expensive non-superheavy TD.
Posts: 665
I know I'm being pedantic but I have to point out that the Firefly is the most expensive non-heavy tank destroyer (yet arguably inferior in comparison without tulips) at 440 mp / 155 fuel. The Jagpanzer 4 is only 400 mp / 135 fuel.
Sorry, I have to pipe up when people make demonstratively false statements.
Posts: 55
Posts: 1248
52 | |||||
4 | |||||
87 | |||||
31 | |||||
8 | |||||
1 |