Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Gameplay » If you could ban any one faction in team games

If you could ban any one faction in team games

PAGES (3)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
Urza3142
31 Jan 2016, 07:13 AM
#21
avatar of Urza3142

Posts: 44

Going to have to go with Brits. Would choose OKW if they didn't have some of my favorite units in the game. (jagdpanzer iv master race, hetzers gonna hetz, kingkubel)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
kitekaze
31 Jan 2016, 07:48 AM
#22
avatar of kitekaze

Posts: 378

For me, it would be OKW. I get sick of cancerstreck and alien technology already.
Tired of Ostheer? Try Kampfgruppen Lehr mod.

Revival of Panzer Elite in Company of Heroes 2.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
IA3 - HH
31 Jan 2016, 09:13 AM
#23
avatar of IA3 - HH

Posts: 289

british, they have bofors(its a castle), mortar with laser accuracy, super infantry with two FTP, cheap tanks

no british = BALANCE

sorry if my eng is not very good :)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
raw
31 Jan 2016, 09:48 AM
#24
avatar of raw

Posts: 644

Arian Ubermensch Infantry.
5 OP OH tanks in front of your base
blow one up, slap it around
7 OP OH tanks in front of your base
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Grim
31 Jan 2016, 13:58 PM
#25
avatar of Grim

Posts: 1097

OKW.

No contest.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
nee
31 Jan 2016, 14:24 PM
#26
avatar of nee

Posts: 1216

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Jan 2016, 19:27 PMTobis
None, who the hell wants less content and variety in the game?
Most players, it seems.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Gumboot
2 Feb 2016, 02:49 AM
#27
avatar of Gumboot

Posts: 199

jump backJump back to quoted post30 Jan 2016, 21:15 PMTobis

It happens about as often as USF into Calliope or Pershing.


I don't know which is worse for the game. The fact that the American players had to pay for that or the fact that the OKW can all do it without paying for it.

One promotes P2W in the game the other means you see it more often then the first.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Tobis
2 Feb 2016, 02:51 AM
#28
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Feb 2016, 02:49 AMGumboot


I don't know which is worse for the game. The fact that the American players had to pay for that or the fact that the OKW can all do it without paying for it.

One promotes P2W in the game the other means you see it more often then the first.


I don't think either are valid reasons to justify taking a whole faction out of the game.
Tobis "Complete Throw"

Someone asked what my avatar was from... I really don't know.

Defeated Paula and knocked him out of 2v2 Anniversary Cup :snfBarton:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Doomlord52
2 Feb 2016, 03:01 AM
#29
avatar of Doomlord52

Posts: 960

Brits.

OKW is at least fixable via tweaking existing units. Brits brought back camping as a fundamental faction design - which has no place in CoH.

Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
TheGentlemenTroll
2 Feb 2016, 04:15 AM
#30
avatar of TheGentlemenTroll

Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1

Brits

Vickers are a pain, simcity is a pain, cromwell is a pain, everything is a pain.
bg /l
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Captain QQ
2 Feb 2016, 12:17 PM
#31
avatar of Captain QQ

Posts: 365

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Feb 2016, 02:51 AMTobis


I don't think either are valid reasons to justify taking a whole faction out of the game.


It could never happen. This poll basically discovers which factions this forum finds to be the most anti-fun.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Pablonano
2 Feb 2016, 12:20 PM
#32
avatar of Pablonano

Posts: 297

i would ban soviets, i am tired of see them playing more defensive than osthern fortificated armor doctrine and lossing games because of that

Bergetiger is love, Bergetiger is life

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Thunderhun
2 Feb 2016, 12:22 PM
#33
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

jump backJump back to quoted post31 Jan 2016, 13:58 PMGrim
OKW.

No contest.


Brits.

No contest.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
JohnSmith
2 Feb 2016, 12:30 PM
#34
avatar of JohnSmith

Posts: 1273

OKW. At least Brits have different tactics than just VolksVolksVolksVolksVolks.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WingZero
2 Feb 2016, 19:49 PM
#35
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

Tea or something strongahh?!
Playercard of WingZero

4v4: Pstreak: - 1with STALKER ★★★, -NSO-Sasha, & Happy Camper
4v4: Pstreak: + 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown
4v4: Pstreak: + 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown
4v4: Pstreak: - 2with -NSO-Sasha, Happy Camper, & -NSO- HitzeLockdown


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Grim
2 Feb 2016, 20:00 PM
#36
avatar of Grim

Posts: 1097

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Feb 2016, 12:22 PMThunderhun


volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.

No contest.



But I agree that the UKF could be removed......UNTIL IT IS REBUFFED TO ITS FORMER GLORY MWUAHAHAHAHA
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Thunderhun
3 Feb 2016, 01:25 AM
#37
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

jump backJump back to quoted post2 Feb 2016, 20:00 PMGrim



But I agree that the UKF could be removed......UNTIL IT IS REBUFFED TO ITS FORMER GLORY MWUAHAHAHAHA


Same situation with OKW;. a faction that lost most of its charm.

I only chose the british removal over OKW because OKW has more badass voice lines.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
SturmTigerVorgo
3 Feb 2016, 01:51 AM
#38
avatar of SturmTigerVorgo

Posts: 307

Playing against Brits it's worse then going to work...so brits.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Captain QQ
3 Feb 2016, 06:35 AM
#39
avatar of Captain QQ

Posts: 365

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Feb 2016, 01:25 AMThunderhun


I only chose the british removal over OKW because OKW has more badass voice lines.


You must have lost your damn mind

UKF has some of the best one liners I have ever heard in a game.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Thunderhun
4 Feb 2016, 03:34 AM
#40
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Feb 2016, 06:35 AMCaptain QQ


You must have lost your damn mind

UKF has some of the best one liners I have ever heard in a game.


I might have. :p

True that the brits sound amazing (tommies and cromwell <444>3 ) but no1 can beat the evil voices of OKW in my eyes.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (3)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
0 user is browsing this thread:
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Gameplay » If you could ban any one faction in team games

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
13
 Download
Download
1315
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

1074 users are online: 1074 guests
0 post in the last 24h
19 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
Registered members: 51669
Welcome our newest member, Wnukowskit
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM