If you could ban any one faction in team games
Posts: 44
Posts: 378
Posts: 289
no british = BALANCE
Posts: 644
Posts: 1096
No contest.
Posts: 1216
None, who the hell wants less content and variety in the game?Most players, it seems.
Posts: 199
It happens about as often as USF into Calliope or Pershing.
I don't know which is worse for the game. The fact that the American players had to pay for that or the fact that the OKW can all do it without paying for it.
One promotes P2W in the game the other means you see it more often then the first.
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
I don't know which is worse for the game. The fact that the American players had to pay for that or the fact that the OKW can all do it without paying for it.
One promotes P2W in the game the other means you see it more often then the first.
I don't think either are valid reasons to justify taking a whole faction out of the game.
Posts: 960
OKW is at least fixable via tweaking existing units. Brits brought back camping as a fundamental faction design - which has no place in CoH.
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Vickers are a pain, simcity is a pain, cromwell is a pain, everything is a pain.
Posts: 365
I don't think either are valid reasons to justify taking a whole faction out of the game.
It could never happen. This poll basically discovers which factions this forum finds to be the most anti-fun.
Posts: 297
Posts: 1617
Posts: 1273
Posts: 1484
Posts: 1096
volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.volks.
No contest.
But I agree that the UKF could be removed......UNTIL IT IS REBUFFED TO ITS FORMER GLORY MWUAHAHAHAHA
Posts: 1617
But I agree that the UKF could be removed......UNTIL IT IS REBUFFED TO ITS FORMER GLORY MWUAHAHAHAHA
Same situation with OKW;. a faction that lost most of its charm.
I only chose the british removal over OKW because OKW has more badass voice lines.
Posts: 307
Posts: 365
I only chose the british removal over OKW because OKW has more badass voice lines.
You must have lost your damn mind
UKF has some of the best one liners I have ever heard in a game.
Posts: 1617
You must have lost your damn mind
UKF has some of the best one liners I have ever heard in a game.
I might have.
True that the brits sound amazing (tommies and cromwell ) but no1 can beat the evil voices of OKW in my eyes.
Livestreams
8 | |||||
5 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.605218.735+1
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1109614.644+10
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM