1 
Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
)
Posts: 210
Posts: 320
1 Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
So... you want to nerf the Stuart and buff the Luchs? For what?
The Luchs already shreds infantry. The Stuart isn't even really good at anything besides picking off at armored cars.
Posts: 552
Reducing the luchs mp would not really affect the timing of it, the reason it should be cheaper is that it loses to all light vehicles.
Stuart is very good against inf aswell, this mp increase would make usf rethink if they want to get a pack howitzer or a fast stuart, now they can get both because the stuart is so cheap mp wise.
Posts: 1891
1 Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
Stuart is fine, IMO it's cheap price, timing, and utility make it the best light ingame.
Can tank a lot of damage, super fast, free capping and self repair, and sight range through vet and not ability use. It hard counters all Axis light vehicles in a vacuum and helps USF deal with lategame heavies with its abilities. It's honestly one of the best designed units in the game.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
Well yeah, it loses to light tanks if you expect to frontally assault each other.
Stuart is fairly weak AI, stuart isn't even that cheap either. What, 70 fuel and 240 mp for a kinda crappy generalist light tank? Most people just tech M20, then get captain, then get mediums. Stuart has fallen out of the meta bro, no need to nerf it.
Posts: 78
That still doesnt mean that it should be dirt cheap mp wise.
1 Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
Now compare fuel costs and you'll see a pattern.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I dont remember the exact stats for the fuel costs and the stat sites are outdated, but stuart is 60 + another 60 for the captain, for luchs its 10/5 for the truck 40 setup and 60 for luchs, 20 ish fuel difference.
And i dont remember if the factions have the same starting fuel, plus usf can push the map early game to secure better fuel income anyway.
The stuart completely hardcounters the luchs with the captain, but again the point was not to nerf stuart stat wise, just to make usf choose between fast stuart or pack howitzer
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
Basically, the less menpower unit cost, the more expensive it is fuel wise, so cost effectiveness is kept on correct level.
You want stuart to cost more menpower, then its fuel price would have to be lowered and USF would still get both, pack howi and stuart, just like ost doesn't need to choose between pak40 or pgrens and just can get both.
Posts: 1273
Posts: 808
For the units alone.
Plus what hardcounters what is really irrelevant, it doesn't matter that Stuart hardcounter luchs if luchs have incomparably better AI performance with better AT support.
Stuart is 70.
Luchs is 65.
AEC is 50.
Basically, the less menpower unit cost, the more expensive it is fuel wise, so cost effectiveness is kept on correct level.
You want stuart to cost more menpower, then its fuel price would have to be lowered and USF would still get both, pack howi and stuart, just like ost doesn't need to choose between pak40 or pgrens and just can get both.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Doesn't OKW start with less fuel?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 168
1 Posts: 422 | Subs: 3
USF already manpower starved. Light vehicle play is supposed to be one of their pillars of survival.
No. No price increase to anything in USF.
Posts: 587
Being bad at the game isn't something balance patches can fix.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
T70 is also dirt cheap mp wise (200 mp).
Light vehicle manpower pricing seems weird to me.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
 |
|
|
73 | ||
 |
|
|
42 | ||
|
|
|
|
35 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 | ||
|
|
|
|
22 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
564 | ||
 |
|
|
83 | ||
 |
|
|
55 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
