3/4 allied armor cant penetrate, well based off what i see, the following are a match for if not better than the panther
-Su76
-Su85
-T3485
-IS2
-Cromwell at closer ranges
-Firefly
-Comet
-Jackson
-Pershing
*churchill on closer maps
Back in the days when the panther was actually worth a shit, it was fighting against the shitty joke SU76 the lovely fun to use SU85, and the IS2, maybe some callin meta t34s with mark vehicle. Times have changed. the list of units that can challenge it have doubled. Not to mention allied infantry AT or mines that ALL 3 allied factions now have.
yes it is
Oh please, the only bitching i see here right now is this... you say all those tanks are better than the panther? If so, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE RELIC, Please replace all these OP tanks with a panther to even out the game. really? i would trade a panther over:
su76 - even if you charge a panther in wrecklessly, wins 100% of the time
su85 - flank, gg. panther has more utility as AI as well. Guess you've never used it's triple mgs before
t85 - in a slugfest, frontal armor... you know who wins.
cromwell - same as t85 but easier since even lower pen values
jackson - flank/first shot equals win. again also utility. jackson is purely AT.
and churchill - you're going to mention this piece of crap here? nobody even builds them anymore. was triple nerfed, cost, armor, hp. just a damage sponge.
100% of the time. i would pick a panther over any of those you listed.
comet - about the same but who's shots bounce more?
firefly - like jackson but will lose in a straight out slugfest. however has longer utility in team games with like 90% pen and i guess tulips.
pershing - now who's comparing a heavy vs medium? pershing should win but barely
is2 - i'm not sure how this fight will play out. been a lonnggggggggg time since i used is2
above are situational on how you play against these tanks
i feel this is more bait to get people to reply than anything else.