I would like to know your PERSONAL opinion on how much fun the game is at the moment from a scale from 1 (not enjoyable at all) to 10 (highly enjoyable).
Please also state why you have your opinion.
General user poll: How much do you enjoy playing CoH2?
25 Jan 2016, 09:04 AM
#1
Posts: 1740
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
25 Jan 2016, 09:06 AM
#2
Posts: 498
6 right now, 2v2 cheese is too big of a problem right now, eventhough I like playing allies more the cheese is a must or you lose
The meta game is boring so that's about why
The meta game is boring so that's about why
www.twitch.tv/rawv1 
usf 
okw 
soviets 
ostheer
"Lefh is love, Lefh is life" Festung Support for the winFI
In game know as Törttö ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ
Best rank 1v1 - 33 Soviets, 2v2 - 1 Ostheer RT
usf okw soviets ostheer"Lefh is love, Lefh is life" Festung Support for the win
FIIn game know as Törttö ᶠᶸᶜᵏᵧₒᵤ
Best rank 1v1 - 33 Soviets, 2v2 - 1 Ostheer RT
25 Jan 2016, 09:20 AM
#3
Posts: 301
9/10
I play a lot of different games and there is few where i spend more than 300 hours, i wanna sign for 300 more.
What i like compared to other RTS is that there is no dead moment, 100% action anytime.
It also favorise positionnement, micro and tactic compared to other where your macro and apm is more valuable.
Finally the game is the perfect bridge between RTS ans turn-based games because the game is very slow and authorise you to analyse, think and improvise rather than relying on your pré-game strategy.
I enjoy almost every game.
Kozo.
I play a lot of different games and there is few where i spend more than 300 hours, i wanna sign for 300 more.
What i like compared to other RTS is that there is no dead moment, 100% action anytime.
It also favorise positionnement, micro and tactic compared to other where your macro and apm is more valuable.
Finally the game is the perfect bridge between RTS ans turn-based games because the game is very slow and authorise you to analyse, think and improvise rather than relying on your pré-game strategy.
I enjoy almost every game.
Kozo.
...For conflict is the great teacher,
and pain... the perfect educator...
and pain... the perfect educator...
25 Jan 2016, 09:37 AM
#4
Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7
playing allies is fun, playing axis is a lot more stressful 6/10
25 Jan 2016, 09:39 AM
#5
Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1
I don't know, my computer is always lagging and I haven't played in almost four weeks.
The internal battery has run dry, the game can now be played. However, clock based events will no longer occur.
25 Jan 2016, 09:55 AM
#6
Posts: 1820 | Subs: 2
4 months with out any fix.. I guess i would enjoy, if i played. ^^
25 Jan 2016, 10:04 AM
#7
Posts: 77
Banned5/10. I really fucking hate the cheese blobs. And I don't need anyone telling me how to counter it cause I know how. I just hate that way of playing and it's happening a lot. I also don't enjoy playing against it even if I'm countering it correctly. It's just... whatever.
25 Jan 2016, 10:16 AM
#8
Posts: 928
9/10
I play a lot of different games and there is few where i spend more than 300 hours, i wanna sign for 300 more.
What i like compared to other RTS is that there is no dead moment, 100% action anytime.
It also favorise positionnement, micro and tactic compared to other where your macro and apm is more valuable.
Finally the game is the perfect bridge between RTS ans turn-based games because the game is very slow and authorise you to analyse, think and improvise rather than relying on your pré-game strategy.
I enjoy almost every game.
Kozo.
This game has action, but IMO AOE 3 has more action/work, early game eco micro is a lot tougher than early game micro in coh2 to start with with only 3-5 units to control. And combat happens really quickly.
And AOE 3 also requires you to improvise a lot too.
Not saying CoH2 is bad, its good, just a lot more relaxing and I kinda like the game for it.
I'd give this game a 7/10. Balance is frustrating, sometimes it feels like who can cheese the hardest and this game can get P2W but its relaxing and fun.
Had fun doing this earlier
25 Jan 2016, 10:50 AM
#9
Posts: 334
Voted 6. While I come back for my coh2 fix every now and then, things have got a bit stale of late and you see the same 2-3 builds from each faction. It's just a bit too predictable at times. Still get the odd epic match though which is fun.
25 Jan 2016, 11:10 AM
#10
Posts: 985 | Subs: 2
1/10 Balanced. It is always an issue of balance
News players, try the autoMatch and play a couple of games, if they look it is very difficult(balance not detected by ignoring it), leave playing.
Average user, plays because it's fanboy and hopes that someday is good balanced.
News players, try the autoMatch and play a couple of games, if they look it is very difficult(balance not detected by ignoring it), leave playing.
Average user, plays because it's fanboy and hopes that someday is good balanced.
25 Jan 2016, 11:34 AM
#11
Posts: 1355
7/10
I hate ISGs and Shreckvolks. It makes it to easy for some players to play this game over their potential.
And its 80% of the time against OKW (in 1s), Wehr got lost somewhere.
I hate ISGs and Shreckvolks. It makes it to easy for some players to play this game over their potential.
And its 80% of the time against OKW (in 1s), Wehr got lost somewhere.
25 Jan 2016, 12:33 PM
#12
Posts: 378
6/10
And it get most votes. If not because I hate Blizzard games, I would rate COH2 lower.
Being Relic loyal since Dawn of War, but no longer faithful, especially after their "design & balance" with Dawn of War 2 and Company of Heroes 2.
And it get most votes. If not because I hate Blizzard games, I would rate COH2 lower.
Being Relic loyal since Dawn of War, but no longer faithful, especially after their "design & balance" with Dawn of War 2 and Company of Heroes 2.
25 Jan 2016, 12:36 PM
#13
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
8/10 - in general balance seems fine, revamp of some sov/ost doctrines would be welcome, few units underperform, but not really anything op right now like it used to be.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
25 Jan 2016, 12:55 PM
#14
Posts: 680
Voted 8 though I suspect it wouldn't take too many more games of the shreck spam and ISGs and other crap mentioned etc to see me lose interest quite quickly. I'm not a rager and I don't even necessarily play to win all the time though a diet of cheese bungs you up eventually, especially if it isn't particularly good cheese. I quite like being thrashed by someone who has a bit of style about them, uses unusual units or generally outperforms the meta ( whatever the hell that is) but take little pleasure from beating the same build order and strat no matter who the opponent.
Trying to find ways to counter them is good, but when there is no counter or it is unrealistic and abused continuously you start to wonder why you bothered.
Trying to find ways to counter them is good, but when there is no counter or it is unrealistic and abused continuously you start to wonder why you bothered.
25 Jan 2016, 13:01 PM
#15
Posts: 210
6, because of cheese strats, blobbing, balance and poor factions designs
25 Jan 2016, 13:03 PM
#16
Posts: 59
6/10.
Some games are interesting to play, while others are a stomp (both for and against).
After playing for a few thousand hours, I think it's safe to say that the build orders are getting kind of stale and it just ends up the same old same old.
It's quite fun when there's a real challenge and playing against some top quality players, but when it's a stomp, sometimes it just feels like a waste of time.
The only thing that makes each game different is, arguably, RNG and the snowball.
Some games are interesting to play, while others are a stomp (both for and against).
After playing for a few thousand hours, I think it's safe to say that the build orders are getting kind of stale and it just ends up the same old same old.
It's quite fun when there's a real challenge and playing against some top quality players, but when it's a stomp, sometimes it just feels like a waste of time.
The only thing that makes each game different is, arguably, RNG and the snowball.
 | Playercard of Zero | |||||||||||
|
]
25 Jan 2016, 13:09 PM
#17
4 Posts: 182
win ,lose, love this game ,nothing out there is equal to it, period...
10/10
10/10
25 Jan 2016, 13:45 PM
#18
Posts: 372
2v2+ allies : 10/10 win every game
2v2+ axis : 0/10 lose every game
2v2+ axis : 0/10 lose every game
25 Jan 2016, 14:50 PM
#19
Posts: 289
4, because after 3 years we have: no balance, no MM, no common features, very bad menu design
sorry if my eng is not very good
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
163 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.615220.737+9
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
841 users are online:
841 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49127
Welcome our newest member, Constant
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Constant
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM