Dushkas Overperforming
Posts: 1653
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1487
Posts: 43
Yes.
Because defensive doctrine is meta and I clearly meant lend lease by non meta
Uhm, you wrote "2 non meta doctrines, one is terrible." So yeah...w/e dude, w/e...
Posts: 118
What if we try to fix the soviets? the most "balanced" army its also the worst performing and the one that has more useless doctrines and units...
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Waiting for "M-42 overperforming" thread...
this community ... no normal words. enginers rifles arent op already?
Are you dumb guys? Seems, you aren't playing 1v1 and didn't see this unit in action. Insta pin like old hmg's did, not even time for react. It wouldn't be op if dshk was in defend doctrine but not in Land Lease which is the part of meta (Hans is top player who use it 0.9 of time.)
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
DSHK is a hard counter to infantry, with some lite AT possible. If you see it you have two options as OKW: 1) Use ISG to pick it off at distance or 2) use stuka to wipe it.
It is also still very vulnerable to getting killed on retreat. Try using Falls out of buildings nearby to steal one. Once you have it you will find your Volks nearly unstoppable.
Does not need a change, respectable MG that does good work especially on Axis blobs.
Posts: 474
If it came in a commander with shocks or guards I'd be worried but since its only lend lease(only brave heroes go defensive doctrine). There's not a whole reason to care since that commander doesn't have much utility outside of the M4C Sherman.
Posts: 174
Which is also comes standard in every grenadier's trousers.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
How is is over performing compared to the cheaper, earlier, 180-degree cone, insta suppression, Jesus-bullet shooting MG42?
Which is also comes standard in every grenadier's trousers.
Don't feed the troll
Posts: 466
2. Retreat bug is a huge downfall for it when retreating.
3. Comes out at 2 cp
4. most expensive MG in game
Cry More
Posts: 1617
Seeing how ppl defended the dushka a year earlier. MVGame
Posts: 2885
This thread is pure gold.
Seeing how ppl defended the dushka a year earlier. MVGame
All of these made sense before maxim and guard nerfs. Why would you lock yourself in DShK doctrine when you can just roll out maxims and use your doctrine pick for guards and some real late game tanks, not m4c.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1225
Posts: 493
Posts: 1096
No it doesnt make sense. Dshk and Penals (without flamers) were a non-issue before the recent balance patches. Suddenly they are OP monsters that need to be nerfed. It makes no sense.
I think some people just like to have a 'witch hunt'.
Posts: 284
Livestreams
75 | |||||
49 | |||||
11 | |||||
4 | |||||
29 | |||||
12 | |||||
8 | |||||
7 | |||||
4 | |||||
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM