A) Let's add the Pak to Ost T1
You) That would result in negative consequences 1,2,3
A) Ah, I see. Well how about adding the pak but then adding something to the US Lt tier
You) That could work but then D, E, F
A) Oh right. It's probably not workable then.
Yeah, thats how it should be.
Thing is, most people who open threads have closed their minds to any insight and are interested only in other people stroking their ego about awesome suggestion, which in practice is not as awesome as they thought. Overtime it increases salt levels and its hard to discuss things properly.
Instead what you do is get angry that they would even make an imperfect suggestion and write:
"Another scrub suggestion from a terrible axis fanboy. L2p, idiot."
In your reply above you wrote "Common sense took a week off and went to Bahamas?" This tone is unpleasant as I'm sure you know. If you want an argument or flame war, sure, use it, be sarcastic and condescending. But why? Why do you want that? Why do you want the conflict and why do you want so much conflict?
Yes, I know, reason in the paragraph above
At least, when I see a change of attitude towards me, I immediately change mine to match.
I have less of a restrain when responding to people with specific reputation, but I'm not angry ball of hate, Kluge works this position full time so no need for another one
Everyone's going to make flawed posts. You too.
Never said I don't, there is a reason why I'm invis'd once a while.
The question is how to respond to it. With understanding or with vitriol and hate?