Login

russian armor

Sdfksz 222 Revamp

PAGES (7)down
21 Jan 2016, 08:20 AM
#121
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


A) Let's add the Pak to Ost T1
You) That would result in negative consequences 1,2,3
A) Ah, I see. Well how about adding the pak but then adding something to the US Lt tier
You) That could work but then D, E, F
A) Oh right. It's probably not workable then.


Yeah, thats how it should be.
Thing is, most people who open threads have closed their minds to any insight and are interested only in other people stroking their ego about awesome suggestion, which in practice is not as awesome as they thought. Overtime it increases salt levels and its hard to discuss things properly.



Instead what you do is get angry that they would even make an imperfect suggestion and write:
"Another scrub suggestion from a terrible axis fanboy. L2p, idiot."

In your reply above you wrote "Common sense took a week off and went to Bahamas?" This tone is unpleasant as I'm sure you know. If you want an argument or flame war, sure, use it, be sarcastic and condescending. But why? Why do you want that? Why do you want the conflict and why do you want so much conflict?

Yes, I know, reason in the paragraph above :foreveralone:
At least, when I see a change of attitude towards me, I immediately change mine to match.
I have less of a restrain when responding to people with specific reputation, but I'm not angry ball of hate, Kluge works this position full time so no need for another one :romeoPro:



Everyone's going to make flawed posts. You too.

Never said I don't, there is a reason why I'm invis'd once a while.

The question is how to respond to it. With understanding or with vitriol and hate?


:megusta:
21 Jan 2016, 10:16 AM
#122
avatar of Bulgakov

Posts: 987

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Jan 2016, 08:20 AMKatitof


Yeah, thats how it should be.
Thing is, most people who open threads have closed their minds to any insight and are interested only in other people stroking their ego about awesome suggestion, which in practice is not as awesome as they thought. Overtime it increases salt levels and its hard to discuss things properly.




Yes, I know, reason in the paragraph above :foreveralone:
At least, when I see a change of attitude towards me, I immediately change mine to match.
I have less of a restrain when responding to people with specific reputation, but I'm not angry ball of hate, Kluge works this position full time so no need for another one :romeoPro:




Never said I don't, there is a reason why I'm invis'd once a while.



:megusta:


You don't present people with a viable option of changing their attitude towards you. Their first contact with you is always "you're an idiot scrub who doesn't understand the game". The tone is set, the conflict is on and always will be.

You're relentlessly aggressive to people on the forum. You must know the consequence of that is aggression in return. The only conclusion I can draw is that is what you want. I don't know why. Perhaps it's a strategy to get more replies? You can get replies in more positive ways.

Is it because you enjoy seeing people frustrated and angry? You know that every time that happens, you get poisoned too, right? The troll also pays a price for his trolling. The anger will seep into your real life. You may be able to convince yourself it doesn't but it will.


Thank you for these replies. I'm going to return to ignoring your posts as much as I can. It's just too frustrating to see you slamming people for no reason.
21 Jan 2016, 15:45 PM
#123
avatar of Nabarxos

Posts: 392

This is a thread about the 222......

Back on topic......

Also OP did you consider the idea of a T2 stug with the short barrel??

Would solve alot of problems
21 Jan 2016, 17:02 PM
#124
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384


Currently Ostheer is stuck into static play until T3 because any light armour they pull is immediately invalidated by the Allied light armour in the form of Stuarts, Quads, T-70s, AECs which arrive only a minute or so after unless you're bleeding the other side dry with sniper play, but that's another issue of snipers being too strong, yet a necessary crutch for Ostheer to compete in the infantry war against WFA/Brits. Furthermore, if against USF, the Captain alone negates effective usage of the car.



1. If you support your units with nearby AT, he can't bumrush it with light vehicles. It's a dance of micro, you don't have to avoid using things/use them suicidally simply because he has a counter on the field. (I see a shit ton of people do this when I watch Dane's Propaganda Cast.) You don't need to even kill him, just hurt him so he has to go lick his wounds.

2. Captain can only be one spot on the map. Car can drive around the map being where he isn't. Americans who rely on Captain exclusively for AT are in for a bad time.
22 Jan 2016, 02:22 AM
#125
avatar of ZeaviS

Posts: 160

Couldn't this unit benefit from getting the territory capping ability of the kubel? It might make it easier to manage paks without taking a hit on map presence. Or is this too counter to the defensive mantra of wehr?
22 Jan 2016, 09:02 AM
#126
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jan 2016, 02:22 AMZeaviS
Couldn't this unit benefit from getting the territory capping ability of the kubel? It might make it easier to manage paks without taking a hit on map presence. Or is this too counter to the defensive mantra of wehr?


the kubel capping is bullshit, the decaping is fine.
22 Jan 2016, 17:22 PM
#127
avatar of whitesky00

Posts: 468



the kubel capping is bullshit, the decaping is fine.


i agree with this one. decap like DoW2 is fine.
PAGES (7)down
0 user is browsing this thread:

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Willy Pete: Shouldn't coh3 heavies actually have insane front armor values? The glory days of 400+ Kt armor wouldn't be as bad when side armor is a thing. Not to say its a good idea lol
Yesterday, 23:14 PM
aerafield: But then again, maybe CoH3 superheavies should actually have insane armor values because the whole game is designed for the clumsy & inept anyway :snfPeter:
Yesterday, 23:04 PM
aerafield: It's like you have to coordinate an entire orchestra of abilities and the correct units, meanwhile your opponent just clicks his 1 superheavy tank occasionally...
Yesterday, 23:01 PM
aerafield: the giga frontal armor also made these units too oppressive in average or low ELO games
Yesterday, 22:59 PM
aerafield: Massive HP pool but reasonable amount of armor is way healthier design
Yesterday, 22:57 PM
aerafield: Say what you want, but the titanium frontal armor design of coh2 superheavies was bullshit. Too many bad players not getting punished for their bad micro because penetration RNG carries them
Yesterday, 22:57 PM
Willy Pete: Also the attack ground with the pak40 looked perfect, that Pershing should be dead
Yesterday, 19:18 PM
Willy Pete: Ahh just saw the other one that died. Some bad rng I think but there was an AT gun at med range for a chunk of that fight
Yesterday, 19:14 PM
Willy Pete: Which KT? I saw one got almost deleted but it also showed its side to a hellcat AND the m5. I think the player even admitted he got lucky
Yesterday, 19:10 PM
Lady Xenarra: I understand that the devs want to sell the Allied part of the DLC, but the KT got swiss cheesed like a COH2 bunker on treads :S
Yesterday, 15:16 PM
SupremeStefan: They should make dlc separataly for axis and alies
Yesterday, 10:28 AM
SupremeStefan: 25$ is actually a ok price for 40 abilites = 8 commanders = 4 battlegroups. But problem is that it comes in bundle
Yesterday, 10:24 AM
Willy Pete: Have they shown the actual trees yet for the new commanders? Skimmed through the deep dive today, didnt see em
Last Thursday, 22:29 PM
Rosbone: Big Tonk boners incoming :hansGASM:
Last Thursday, 17:38 PM
donofsandiego: Probably not
Last Wednesday, 14:57 PM
Lone-Wolf: Hi guys. Error code -4. Any fixes?
08 Feb 2025, 17:09 PM
donofsandiego: Probably not
07 Feb 2025, 16:57 PM
SkYisTheLimiT_CoH: any coh2.org admin there ?
07 Feb 2025, 12:43 PM
Lady Xenarra: Ever the contrarian, aerafield.
07 Feb 2025, 11:59 AM
aerafield: I havent seen the new units in action yet (whose BGs will not be purchased by too many people as they are pretty expensive I recon), but I can say with 100% confidence that the Pershing needs a buff
07 Feb 2025, 02:31 AM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

308 users are online: 308 guests
4 posts in the last 24h
19 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
Registered members: 51661
Welcome our newest member, gbrightp
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM