Posts: 1930
How about pricing units according to their performance?
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
How about pricing units according to their performance? This thread is not about making it the best medium tank, its just about increasing its pen so it won't bounce shots against units that are cheaper hence having a chance to win against unit that have the same role, but destroy the p4 in a 1vs1.
 | Playercard of RedT3rror | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1653
How about pricing units according to their performance? This thread is not about making it the best medium tank, its just about increasing its pen so it won't bounce shots against units that are cheaper hence having a chance to win against unit that have the same role, but destroy the p4 in a 1vs1.
Posts: 68
How about pricing units according to their performance? This thread is not about making it the best medium tank, its just about increasing its pen so it won't bounce shots against units that are cheaper hence having a chance to win against unit that have the same role, but destroy the p4 in a 1vs1.
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Wow, there are so many units not priced simulare. Its not only the perfomance in the vacuum. If you think units should be priced according to their performance why i saw you never say ZIS should be cheaper or Pak should cost more, just to mention one example.
Posts: 334
Make a thread then, if you think this is an issue. I discuss the topic here, if you think other units are UP or OP then please go ahead and the discuss the issue. However it's not an argument to say; "hey, this unit might be too bad for this price, but so is another" - Two wrongs don't make one wright.
Posts: 68
Make a thread then, if you think this is an issue. I discuss the topic here, if you think other units are UP or OP then please go ahead and the discuss the issue. However it's not an argument to say; "hey, this unit might be too bad for this price, but so is another" - Two wrongs don't make one wright.
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Your claim was, that units have to be balanced around their performance and not the mix of units. I disprove your claim on an example. Why should i make a balance thread for that?
Generalise all you want, belittle and be an elitist prick all you want, it's irrelevant.
If anything I'd compare the cost of fielding a Wehr P4 compared to the OKW one. If OKW's is more expensive to field (I doubt it) then reduce the cost accordingly. However doing so would mean making it the same as the Wehr P4. After all, is the vet 2 armour as default and better vet bonuses justifed "coz OKW" now? Nope.
Posts: 334
I'm not here to prove your arguments. Especially when you insult me in your first sentence.
Posts: 1653
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Since when 240 armour (churchill) is better than 234 (okw p4)?
Also kv1 has more armour, more hp and a better gun and still costs less than the p4. At least this thread showed who doesn't care for objective stats.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Guys keep things nice please.
Posts: 1653
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
I stand corrected then. Just did a test between those two tanks on max range, it's ludicrous to observe all the bounced shots. These tanks are so bad for their price tag
You might want to reword that.
And that
KV-1 pen is 80/100/120.
P4 pen is 100/110/120.
but I already made a KV 1 is up thread in October.
 |
|
|
70 | ||
 |
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
