Sherman pen was buffed in UKF alpha and it felt a bit too strong IMO.
paper thin armor, reasonably fast and a powerful gun i'd say its worth the tradeoff since axis armor and at can turn that thing into swiss cheese fast
Posts: 758
Sherman pen was buffed in UKF alpha and it felt a bit too strong IMO.
Posts: 954
Posts: 742 | Subs: 1
Posts: 498
Posts: 830
paper thin armor, reasonably fast and a powerful gun i'd say its worth the tradeoff since axis armor and at can turn that thing into swiss cheese fast
Posts: 158 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 158 | Subs: 2
Stop this Sherman/T34 upgrade to 76mm/34-85.
We all know it won't happen.
We all know we don't need it.
There is already E8.
Let's move along.
Posts: 348
>Dont need it
Implying that we "need" Tigers, Jagdtigers and Tiger IIs if the Panther is already better than every single basic allied tank.
Thats right, we dont. It just gives more choices in your gameplay, if you perhaps prefer to use heavy tanks and all that.
Hence why i suggest making the 76mm Shermans a part of the Mechanized company in order to make the commander atleast somewhat viable.
Posts: 245
Posts: 665
Posts: 380
Greedy USF fanbois, you already got your Pershing and Calliope, but you want more.Pershing is too expensive for its cost, so it's trash. Calliope hmmmm we will see.
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
Posts: 1216
in short: you want to buff Sherman penetration and your idea is the most convoluted way to do it.
lol wut?
74 | |||||
118 | |||||
9 | |||||
6 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |