JPIV Cautious movement - Phaseshifting
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
This is just a vid i made previously to show up the "goods" and how balanced the ability is.
I'm uploading atm another vid to show that it seems to be messing up with hitboxes.
Edit: vid in question
Posts: 2470
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Posts: 952 | Subs: 1
Posts: 871
Posts: 98
Does the cloak state really mess with hit boxes?
Posts: 474
Posts: 1063
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1653
Posts: 935
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Right, Dullahan?
Posts: 559 | Subs: 17
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Oh gosh.. I wish I could see the face of a member here who called me once L2P, noob, just attack ground
#Smokeandflank
I think it was Arch Archer as always
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
#Smokeandflank
I think it was Arch Archer as always
I could not resist and I dug down for it
Australian magic you easily could've destroyed the jp4 with attack ground. Sometimes I think you are the only strategist on coh2.org that has l2p issues.
I generally wouldn't advise to nerf the weakest faction even further.
Jp4 is fine. When it camos while escaping just use attack ground. JP4 moves much slower in camo mode.
You can always use attack ground to attack a cloaked jp4. When cloaked it moves much slower so in most cases it's just l2p.2 at guns counter this unit well and nobody prevents you to do that.
Acht, where are you with your L2P, smoke n flank
Oh that taste... Yummy...
Posts: 403
Posts: 2470
I could not resist and I dug down for it
Acht, where are you with your L2P, smoke n flank
Oh that taste... Yummy...
please don't go to that much effort to be a dick; it's bad for quality of life.
Posts: 154
Worth it!
I could not resist and I dug down for it
Acht, where are you with your L2P, smoke n flank
Oh that taste... Yummy...
Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
please don't go to that much effort to be a dick; it's bad for quality of life.What's so wrong in calling out players who are proven to be wrong? But saying L2P when it's an honest to god bug/balance issue is not a dick move?
To say L2P is not a thing that should be said lightly, as it is demeaning and dismissive to other players, so it is only really merited if the player is not applying his skills properly or has no detailed knowledge of the game. The player who says L2P should have lots of experience applying the remedy he / she is suggesting, otherwise it is just harmful and misleading - why would they say such a thing if they had no practical experience?
If something is in fact not a skill related issue, then the player, by saying "L2P", is committing actual harm to the community by obscuring actual issues, shifting burden away from the actual cause of the issue to the skill of the player.
Every time someone said attack ground and L2P in a JPIV thread, they actively contributed to keeping this bug from being detected. Imagine if everyone said "There is no Vickers range bug, it gets better range in buildings, L2P".
You might say these people had no reason to suspect that JPIV cloak behaves any different from other cloaked units. But if so, this means they didn't actually encounter the scenario where the JPIV did the cloak / decloak dance and they didn't actually destroy a single JPIV through attack ground.
If they didn't encounter that scenario, what gives them the right to say L2P?
If you have the temerity to insult other players' skill, you better damn well know what you are talking about. And if you do and are still proven wrong, you deserve to eat crow.
Livestreams
51 | |||||
10 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, GiovannidfRoach
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM