hammer gammon bombs are too expensive
11 Nov 2015, 02:22 AM
#1
Posts: 1930
75mu for 3 seconds, 200 damage and vehicle stun is too much. the ability should cost 45 munition at the most.
11 Nov 2015, 12:02 PM
#2
Posts: 954
Agreed, and I still finds out that Churchill+firefly is the better way then the comet
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
11 Nov 2015, 12:05 PM
#3
Posts: 271
Agreed, and I still finds out that Churchill+firefly is the better way then the comet
But the croc with the blitz is good as well.. Though I never see it from other players.
 | Playercard of Raider_Judo | |||||||||||||||||||
|
11 Nov 2015, 12:06 PM
#4
Posts: 179
I agree, 45 Muni would be OK.
11 Nov 2015, 12:12 PM
#5
Posts: 732
I think they forgot to change the prize after massive nerf. It was a good nerf tho because it was a demo charge that was trown like a nade before.
11 Nov 2015, 12:21 PM
#6
Posts: 721
light gammon,hammer gammon bombs and of course bundle grenades need to be looked at heavily
11 Nov 2015, 12:23 PM
#7
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Comet is also shitty as hell. Better to get two cromwells then tech to hammer and get the commet. Also, heavy engineers...
11 Nov 2015, 18:41 PM
#8
Posts: 509
+1 75muni is too much for a satchel charge with a cool name
11 Nov 2015, 19:07 PM
#9
Posts: 1384
Yeah cost is way too high.
imo should destroy engines if it's gonna cost that much.
imo should destroy engines if it's gonna cost that much.
11 Nov 2015, 22:58 PM
#10
Posts: 2779
Comet is also shitty as hell. Better to get two cromwells then tech to hammer and get the commet. Also, heavy engineers...
Dafug?
12 Nov 2015, 03:05 AM
#11
Posts: 43
light gammon,hammer gammon bombs and of course bundle grenades need to be looked at heavilythis so hard this
Comet is also shitty as hell. Better to get two cromwells then tech to hammer and get the commet. Also, heavy engineers...2 cromwells cost way more mp and fuel than 1 comet so I disagree comet is far from bad
12 Nov 2015, 12:54 PM
#12
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Dafug?
Churchills are in most effective tactic (anvil) and have more combat effectivnes than comets. 1400up vs 800. And better accuracy to snipe the infantry. There is no point to take comet over churchill.
2 cromwells cost way more mp and fuel than 1 comet so I disagree comet is far from bad
100 and 50 + 580? And 180 is 680 and 230 vs 2x 680 and 220. So, who won you think?
12 Nov 2015, 13:24 PM
#13
Posts: 271
Churchill is indeed really accurate against infantry, and the nade is cheap and really effective! Also Churchill will be up close and personal allot to be able to throw the nade. (though the nade is often buggy and doesnt throw)
but I believe the Comet has better damage / penetatrion / range, against vehicles than churchill.
Comet is really not a bad tank..
Churchill just has more appealing and popular things that come with it, like the heavy engineers. which I personally only use for repairs - I should really try some bren guns on them - but they are sooo slow..
Anyway. I mostly use the Vanguard doctrine. I dont see a point in going churchill and croc both, so I end up using hammer allot. The brits warspeed / blitz mechanic that comes with it allows for some saves on a croc, that you would probably have lost otherwise. (I love the vet.. vet2 movement speed - vet 3 passive engine repairs)
In the end I guess its a question of, do you want a churchill and firefly,
or a croc + firefly or comet. The latter seems better to me, (more flexiable) but im sure there are hundreds who disagree.
but I believe the Comet has better damage / penetatrion / range, against vehicles than churchill.
Comet is really not a bad tank..
Churchill just has more appealing and popular things that come with it, like the heavy engineers. which I personally only use for repairs - I should really try some bren guns on them - but they are sooo slow..
Anyway. I mostly use the Vanguard doctrine. I dont see a point in going churchill and croc both, so I end up using hammer allot. The brits warspeed / blitz mechanic that comes with it allows for some saves on a croc, that you would probably have lost otherwise. (I love the vet.. vet2 movement speed - vet 3 passive engine repairs)
In the end I guess its a question of, do you want a churchill and firefly,
or a croc + firefly or comet. The latter seems better to me, (more flexiable) but im sure there are hundreds who disagree.
| Playercard of Raider_Judo | |||||||||||||||||||
|
12 Nov 2015, 16:42 PM
#14
Posts: 2779
Churchills are in most effective tactic (anvil) and have more combat effectivnes than comets. 1400up vs 800. And better accuracy to snipe the infantry. There is no point to take comet over churchill.
100 and 50 + 580? And 180 is 680 and 230 vs 2x 680 and 220. So, who won you think?
Comet shine with its armor and WP rounds.
12 Nov 2015, 16:49 PM
#15
Posts: 738
Comet shine with its armor and WP rounds.
WP rounds are vet and don't even work half the time (they're bugged)
12 Nov 2015, 18:39 PM
#16
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
As Rollo said + churchill have better armor, better gun against inf and much more hp (double more). Also with anvil we got heavy sappers and much better artillery. So, u wot m8?
12 Nov 2015, 19:46 PM
#17
Posts: 271
Better arty how?
| Playercard of Raider_Judo | |||||||||||||||||||
|
12 Nov 2015, 20:14 PM
#18
Posts: 1484
Yea, the munition price is too much.
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
13 Nov 2015, 13:48 PM
#19
10 
Posts: 871
As Rollo said + churchill have better armor, better gun against inf and much more hp (double more). Also with anvil we got heavy sappers and much better artillery. So, u wot m8?
Churchill doesn't really have that much more armour since it was nerfed compared to the Comet and when you factor in the Churchill has to be closer to shoot its gun, the difference will be minimal. The Churchills gun is pretty poor vs anything with armour where as the comet has decent penetration. Also the churchill doesn't have double the HP, comet has 800 and churchill has 1400? ish now I believe. Comet has the advantage of being significantly more mobile especially with war speed and they are able to hunt in packs. WP (aside from being super buggy) is really useful when it actually works. A single Panther kills churchills pretty easily especially if you have a spotter. Comets at least have a decent chance 1v1 vs Panthers.
13 Nov 2015, 13:51 PM
#20
Posts: 1653
Comet is way better than you think, can take on Panthers without that big of a problem. Don't know where people are getting it from that the Comet is shit.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
327 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.602216.736-1
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1109614.644+10
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.261137.656+2
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1235
Board Info
962 users are online:
962 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM