Login

russian armor

hammer gammon bombs are too expensive

11 Nov 2015, 02:22 AM
#1
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

75mu for 3 seconds, 200 damage and vehicle stun is too much. the ability should cost 45 munition at the most.
11 Nov 2015, 12:02 PM
#2
avatar of UGBEAR

Posts: 954

Agreed, and I still finds out that Churchill+firefly is the better way then the comet
11 Nov 2015, 12:05 PM
#3
avatar of Jewdo

Posts: 271

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Nov 2015, 12:02 PMUGBEAR
Agreed, and I still finds out that Churchill+firefly is the better way then the comet


But the croc with the blitz is good as well.. Though I never see it from other players.
11 Nov 2015, 12:06 PM
#4
avatar of Leepriest

Posts: 179

I agree, 45 Muni would be OK.
11 Nov 2015, 12:12 PM
#5
avatar of chipwreckt

Posts: 732

I think they forgot to change the prize after massive nerf. It was a good nerf tho because it was a demo charge that was trown like a nade before.
11 Nov 2015, 12:21 PM
#6
avatar of mycalliope

Posts: 721

light gammon,hammer gammon bombs and of course bundle grenades need to be looked at heavily
11 Nov 2015, 12:23 PM
#7
avatar of Frost

Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1

Comet is also shitty as hell. Better to get two cromwells then tech to hammer and get the commet. Also, heavy engineers...
11 Nov 2015, 18:41 PM
#8
avatar of Junaid

Posts: 509

+1 75muni is too much for a satchel charge with a cool name
11 Nov 2015, 19:07 PM
#9
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384

Yeah cost is way too high.

imo should destroy engines if it's gonna cost that much.

11 Nov 2015, 22:58 PM
#10
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Nov 2015, 12:23 PMFrost
Comet is also shitty as hell. Better to get two cromwells then tech to hammer and get the commet. Also, heavy engineers...


Dafug?
12 Nov 2015, 03:05 AM
#11
avatar of EugeneTheDestroyer

Posts: 43

light gammon,hammer gammon bombs and of course bundle grenades need to be looked at heavily
this so hard this

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Nov 2015, 12:23 PMFrost
Comet is also shitty as hell. Better to get two cromwells then tech to hammer and get the commet. Also, heavy engineers...
2 cromwells cost way more mp and fuel than 1 comet so I disagree comet is far from bad
12 Nov 2015, 12:54 PM
#12
avatar of Frost

Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Nov 2015, 22:58 PMPorygon


Dafug?


Churchills are in most effective tactic (anvil) and have more combat effectivnes than comets. 1400up vs 800. And better accuracy to snipe the infantry. There is no point to take comet over churchill.

2 cromwells cost way more mp and fuel than 1 comet so I disagree comet is far from bad


100 and 50 + 580? And 180 is 680 and 230 vs 2x 680 and 220. So, who won you think?
12 Nov 2015, 13:24 PM
#13
avatar of Jewdo

Posts: 271

Churchill is indeed really accurate against infantry, and the nade is cheap and really effective! Also Churchill will be up close and personal allot to be able to throw the nade. (though the nade is often buggy and doesnt throw)

but I believe the Comet has better damage / penetatrion / range, against vehicles than churchill.

Comet is really not a bad tank..

Churchill just has more appealing and popular things that come with it, like the heavy engineers. which I personally only use for repairs - I should really try some bren guns on them - but they are sooo slow..

Anyway. I mostly use the Vanguard doctrine. I dont see a point in going churchill and croc both, so I end up using hammer allot. The brits warspeed / blitz mechanic that comes with it allows for some saves on a croc, that you would probably have lost otherwise. (I love the vet.. vet2 movement speed - vet 3 passive engine repairs)

In the end I guess its a question of, do you want a churchill and firefly,
or a croc + firefly or comet. The latter seems better to me, (more flexiable) but im sure there are hundreds who disagree.
12 Nov 2015, 16:42 PM
#14
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Nov 2015, 12:54 PMFrost


Churchills are in most effective tactic (anvil) and have more combat effectivnes than comets. 1400up vs 800. And better accuracy to snipe the infantry. There is no point to take comet over churchill.



100 and 50 + 580? And 180 is 680 and 230 vs 2x 680 and 220. So, who won you think?


Comet shine with its armor and WP rounds.
12 Nov 2015, 16:49 PM
#15
avatar of Rollo

Posts: 738

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Nov 2015, 16:42 PMPorygon


Comet shine with its armor and WP rounds.


WP rounds are vet and don't even work half the time (they're bugged)
12 Nov 2015, 18:39 PM
#16
avatar of Frost

Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1

As Rollo said + churchill have better armor, better gun against inf and much more hp (double more). Also with anvil we got heavy sappers and much better artillery. So, u wot m8?
12 Nov 2015, 19:46 PM
#17
avatar of Jewdo

Posts: 271

Better arty how?
12 Nov 2015, 20:14 PM
#18
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

Yea, the munition price is too much.
13 Nov 2015, 13:48 PM
#19
avatar of Puppetmaster
Patrion 310

Posts: 871

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Nov 2015, 18:39 PMFrost
As Rollo said + churchill have better armor, better gun against inf and much more hp (double more). Also with anvil we got heavy sappers and much better artillery. So, u wot m8?


Churchill doesn't really have that much more armour since it was nerfed compared to the Comet and when you factor in the Churchill has to be closer to shoot its gun, the difference will be minimal. The Churchills gun is pretty poor vs anything with armour where as the comet has decent penetration. Also the churchill doesn't have double the HP, comet has 800 and churchill has 1400? ish now I believe. Comet has the advantage of being significantly more mobile especially with war speed and they are able to hunt in packs. WP (aside from being super buggy) is really useful when it actually works. A single Panther kills churchills pretty easily especially if you have a spotter. Comets at least have a decent chance 1v1 vs Panthers.
13 Nov 2015, 13:51 PM
#20
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

Comet is way better than you think, can take on Panthers without that big of a problem. Don't know where people are getting it from that the Comet is shit.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Last Wednesday, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Last Tuesday, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

564 users are online: 564 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
73 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53299
Welcome our newest member, Reynalds
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM