Login

russian armor

Why no MG Upgrade for the Pershing?

6 Nov 2015, 02:43 AM
#1
avatar of Ulaire Minya

Posts: 372

Not a complaint, just wondering as to the reasoning behind it considering even the expensive US .50 cal pintle mounted MG's don't do much.
6 Nov 2015, 03:21 AM
#2
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

USF is overpowered enough already.
6 Nov 2015, 03:22 AM
#3
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

The idea I believe is that the pershing has good enough AI with its main cannon, and that the vet 2 ability makes use of the hatch to throw grenades.
6 Nov 2015, 05:31 AM
#4
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Because the Pershing didn't have a turret MG. The closest it had was a rear-mounted M2, but this required the TC to stand on the engine bay to use. Obviously the turret can not turn while this MG is being used.

6 Nov 2015, 05:33 AM
#5
avatar of Intelligence209

Posts: 1124

its main cannon AI is perfect as is....
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

340 users are online: 1 member and 339 guests
aerafield
0 post in the last 24h
2 posts in the last week
42 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48182
Welcome our newest member, amritaarora
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM