Posts: 2819
I find it really immature that you shitpost in serious discussions although you don't play the game in the discussed mode. When was the last time you played several games as axis in 2vs2 random or at? It's over a month ago.
Yeah right buddy this is so serious!
.
Posts: 1705
i had some random 2v2 as ost this morning. since t1 is broken i skipped it and tried mg spam, 3 pgrens, p4/stug. worked everytime
Posts: 1225
Theres a difference between unplayable and not wanting to go meta.
1 
Posts: 609
This is what i do - Buld 2mg42,1 pio.Tech.222 car,3 pzgren,1 pak ,tech ,2 stug/panzer 4.Stall for tiger.Spam mines.Works well in 2 vs 2 due to capping power not being needed.
However against british emplacement strategy you will find it struggles.
T1 is really waste of space due to grenadiers being just awful.They have no scalability past midgame.Panzegrenadiers if used iwth mg42 can do better,atleast until vet allied lmg blob.Even pzgren can't stop that.
 | Playercard of Array | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1705
This would be very vulnerable to an M3 / carrier start until the 222 appears unless their micro is poor enough to let you use the old 1 mg covering the other to destroy them. Also vulnerable to US smoke n flank.
Of course it does depend if your teammate supports well but I often find you combine forces and then realise you have no map.
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
