Rate the Factions, Overall (1 being best and 5 worse)

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 378

I don't play 1v1, nor I want to rate it, because it's too depended on early advantage.

But 2v2:
1. Ostheer
2. Soviet
3. Brit
4. OKW
5. USF

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

On the great scheme of skill levels and maps.
1v1: USF > SU>=OH > UKF > OKW
2v2: SU/UKF > OH > USF/OKW
3v3+: UKF > SU/OH/OKW > USF

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 380

USA USA USA USA

Posts: 680

I rate them as they appeard and then by alphabet. So Ost first, then Soviets, then Usf or Okw as I am not sure if U is before O in the alphabet.

Here:
1 Ostheer
2 Soviets
3 Usf
4 Okw
5 Brits

Posts: 473

Permanently Banned

Strenght:
1. USA
2. Soviets
3. Brits/Ostheer
4. OKW

Design:
1. Ostheer
2. Soviets
3. Brits
4. USF
5. OKW

Fun to play
1. Soviets/USF
2. Ostheer
3. OKW

(altough it is a lovely faction with powerful units, its design just dominates my experience)
* Brits (don't own it, can't place it anywhere)

Whenever I face USF as OKW, it feels like I have been strapped down into a mental hospital wheelchair, with legs that can't reach the floor to move myself forward and a nurse is trying to move the wheelchair backwards whilst I have to race a formula one car for a best of three laps.

It feels handicapped from the start

No thumbs, cute and a lot of furry fluffiness, I am the ultimate kitten and by the heavens, am I angry!

Multi Quote

Posts: 466

1 USF
2 OST
3 SU
4 OKW
5 BRITS

1. Relic bans, not me. 2. It stands in the rules: If you are banned more often, the duration increase and can lead in the end to permaban 3. The Case is bigger as you guys think. So pls step 1 step away pls. 4. I am not a player in the 4vs4 cup, because of RL work.

Multi Quote

Posts: 622

1. USF
2. SU
3. OH
4. UKF
5. OKW

Posts: 1891

Worst faction is USF until we get Rangers and Pershing commander.

Until the 29th, Axis will continue to hog all the best infantry, AT, tank destroyers, tanks, support weapons, synergies, abilities, skins, commanders, grenades, offmaps, Ostruppen, decals, defenses, voice overs, base layouts, and small arms weapon profiles in the game.

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

26 Oct 2015, 05:59 AMBeefSurge

Worst faction is USF until we get Rangers and Pershing commander.

Until the 29th, Axis will continue to hog all the best infantry, AT, tank destroyers, tanks, support weapons, synergies, abilities, skins, commanders, grenades, offmaps, Ostruppen, decals, defenses, voice overs, base layouts, and small arms weapon profiles in the game.

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

1. Brits
2. USF
3. Soviets
4. OP(LOLZ)KW
5. Ostheer

BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.

Multi Quote

Posts: 1702

1. USF
2. OST
3. SOV
4. BRITS
5. OKW

Posts: 1026

Wait did something happen? I've been getting massacred in team games by OKW players (as Brits) for what feels like weeks thanks to ISG nonsense. Or is this only for 1v1? Legit shocked at seeing people put them last.