Posts: 132
There are plenty of reason to still pickup other commanders, you're scaring me if you don't see them.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Lol, for that scary Willy jeep? For flame riflemen and a so-so medium tank? For paras? The ever feared m8? The only thing I could think if is emergency m10s.
Posts: 1026
4 Posts: 113
Posts: 758
USF Commander #2 featuring Calliope pls.
Rifle is probably going to be out of the spotlight for a while but Inf/AB and the new ones should theoretically be viable assuming no major fuckups. Probably outright OP for the first patch as is oft the case with new content...
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
SO you will see Pershing and Hetzer in every game for the first week, but after that you gonna see Infantry or Armor back again.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Correction: Rifles and Armor back again (unless we are talking about teamgames).
Posts: 103
Posts: 1617
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
After this Commander sold enough gets a nerf and comes a new Commander.
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Im just big fan of Priests spam, Paras with thompson and Assault Engis, that's why I alway have problems with picking doctrines... Armor or Airborne... (talking about 2v2)
Posts: 758
Im big fan of Assault engis too (in 1 vs 1), they have really nice utility (mines , demos , flametrower , good point blank DPS , repairs)
However i cant make priest in 1 vs 1 work
Posts: 174
Im just big fan of Priests spam, Paras with thompson and Assault Engis, that's why I alway have problems with picking doctrines... Armor or Airborne... (talking about 2v2)
Posts: 334
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
If this commander is as strong in the game as it looks on paper, GLHF tourney organizers in deciding whether or not to ban it. 
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
My excitement for the new units going into the game is tempered by the fact that they are behind a DLC paywall. In b4 we all have to argue about "pay-to-win" again.
Posts: 758
Its problem is not better panther that will cost like tiger.
Its problem is synenerzy of its abilities (mines , smoke , better stats in huge pushes , elite infantry , great tank) that icrease already potent faction in 1 vs 1
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
but what about 3v3 and 4v4? have you ever considered that into the equation?
Posts: 1217
Hell yesz the M26 Pershing is here for USF to use. bout time USF get a heavy tank of their own it was waaaaaay long overdue. now we have a tank that can survive more shots then a sherman. i cant w8 to start punching big holes in the axis more-bang-for-their-buck mobile pillbox tanks (i mean all of them starting with the panzer iv and panther)with the Pershing supported by infantry, M4 shermans and M36 jacksons of course!I bet you are going to be the first one coming here crying that your Pershing gets defeated by Paks, StuGs, Jagdpanzer, Elefant and Jagdtiger.
Posts: 758
I bet you are going to be the first one coming here crying that your Pershing gets defeated by Paks, StuGs, Jagdpanzer, Elefant and Jagdtiger.
You´ve got the typical Tiger syndrome just the other way around.
 |
|
|
736 | ||
 |
|
|
80 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
0 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
