Login

russian armor

Pershing

PAGES (9)down
15 Oct 2015, 05:19 AM
#61
avatar of Khan

Posts: 578



USF PLAYERS. It's time. For years we have endured paper tanks, paper infantry...

But now, men.

Times have changed! Our riflemen are smart and beefy as ever, our new Pershing tanks are finally a match for the German tanks.

And now, our battle hardened Rangers, will turn the tide of battle.

USF PLAYERS. I ask that you BELIEVE,

NO!

I ask that you KNOW

THAT USF IS FINALLY OP.

God bless ALL USF PLAYERS/FANBOIS that have withered the storm through these many months.

The time is now, gentlemen.


weathered* :foreveralone:
15 Oct 2015, 05:36 AM
#62
avatar of Intelligence209

Posts: 1124

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 05:17 AMAladdin
Alright folks this is what is going to happen;
and please remember this :)

They will release this Commander OP, so that everyone go ahead and buys it. Then after a while that Relic collects all his money from COH2 community, they go ahead and will nerf it!!! :)
you will see :)

I just can't wait to see how funny it is when after a while in the patch notes they will write;

"we thought the rangers were overperforming..."
"we thought the Pershing was overperforming..."

(but with that sentance they actually mean, we just wanted your money as fast as possible) :D


As much as I want you to be wrong, after the British with the commandos, Churchills and its variants, and the emplacements wondering how they made if from alpha to release like that, I think your right..
15 Oct 2015, 05:44 AM
#63
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 05:19 AMKhan



Im from the south.

and the way I have always heard and said it myself sounded like "withered" not weathered. :foreveralone:

#ThatAmericanEducationTho
15 Oct 2015, 06:00 AM
#64
avatar of UGBEAR

Posts: 954

I really want a pershing before the heavy nerf, right now only one heavy on the field crippled the allied faction(and wehr tiger user), relic should limit the uber-heavy like JT/Elephant to one not those Tiger/IS-2 and highly likely pershing.


and I think it's time for allied non-doctrinal tank to up-gunned, M4A3(76mm) and T-34/85 for T4? Allied non-doctrinal tank is vastly underpowered compare to the Germans' AKA panther/JP4
15 Oct 2015, 06:26 AM
#65
avatar of Highfiveeeee

Posts: 1740

In fact they will release a commander and 'delete' six others for it because they are by far not as good.
Hat
15 Oct 2015, 06:35 AM
#66
avatar of Hat

Posts: 166

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 05:17 AMAladdin

"we thought the rangers were overperforming..."
"we thought the Pershing was overperforming..."

(but with that sentance they actually mean, we just wanted your money as fast as possible) :D


DLC content seems to be left overpowered.
15 Oct 2015, 07:06 AM
#67
avatar of slother

Posts: 145

CalliOPe next ? :foreveralone:
15 Oct 2015, 07:20 AM
#68
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

I don't really understand the hype around the Rangers and the Pershing.

1- You don't need Pershing in 1vs1
2- You don't need Pershing in teamgame
3- RM x2 BARs or x2 1919 are more than enough AI, you don't need Rangers.
4- The doctrine seriously lack of arty.

Smoke barrage is probably here because the pershing will not have it.
Unless Rangers have sprint or a camo stuff, they pretty much being redundant with vet3 RM.

I prefer 10 times more call-in 2-3 M10 to take out heavies with a good arty barrage combo than 1 pershing for probably the same price :D

The commander may be OP at its release and get hard nerf after a month, I'm not gonna complain about it since I'm pretty much certain to not buy it.
15 Oct 2015, 07:33 AM
#69
avatar of UGBEAR

Posts: 954

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 07:20 AMEsxile
I don't really understand the hype around the Rangers and the Pershing.

1- You don't need Pershing in 1vs1
2- You don't need Pershing in teamgame
3- RM x2 BARs or x2 1919 are more than enough AI, you don't need Rangers.
4- The doctrine seriously lack of arty.

Smoke barrage is probably here because the pershing will not have it.
Unless Rangers have sprint or a camo stuff, they pretty much being redundant with vet3 RM.

I prefer 10 times more call-in 2-3 M10 to take out heavies with a good arty barrage combo than 1 pershing for probably the same price :D

The commander may be OP at its release and get hard nerf after a month, I'm not gonna complain about it since I'm pretty much certain to not buy it.


I think most sober ppl know that Pershing is just a glorified doctrinal panther, maybe worse, but ppl just want a pershing that's all .
15 Oct 2015, 07:54 AM
#70
avatar of Esxile

Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 07:33 AMUGBEAR


I think most sober ppl know that Pershing is just a glorified doctrinal panther, maybe worse, but ppl just want a pershing that's all .


Yes I know. What I want is vcoh Attrition ability, buildable arty howitzer ML-20 like and auto-repair in combat mode (not necessarly in the same doctrine). Because their were very well thought and design with the USF meta.

And I want a copycat of the vcoh airborn doctrine, I'm willing to pay 10 bucks for that! :wub:
15 Oct 2015, 08:02 AM
#71
avatar of Dullahan

Posts: 1384



Plus, rifle mines.

Why even go infantry company commander now? :foreveralone:


Because m1919 and priest are dope as fuck.
15 Oct 2015, 08:12 AM
#72
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Inb4 pershing will turn out to be comet, except limited to 1.
15 Oct 2015, 08:47 AM
#73
avatar of AngryKitten465

Posts: 473

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 08:12 AMKatitof
Inb4 pershing will turn out to be comet, except limited to 1.


What is your problem with the comet? Mobile, powerful at and good ai capabilities.
15 Oct 2015, 09:16 AM
#74
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

seeing as the comet is basically a V, i wouldn't be hugely bothered. if the pershing is going to be limited to 1, i assume it'll have some kind of advantage over the V/comet, even if it's a small one.
15 Oct 2015, 09:26 AM
#75
avatar of Maschinengewehr

Posts: 334

Oh cool the Pershing is just a call-in Comet that costs more. The nerf hammer is going to smack that commander hard within a month.

Not hyped and not buying.
15 Oct 2015, 09:40 AM
#76
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



What is your problem with the comet? Mobile, powerful at and good ai capabilities.

I'll give you some time to figure it out by yourself.
Take your time, think slowly and you might get it eventually.
Nuclear Arbitors post is your hint.
15 Oct 2015, 10:09 AM
#77
avatar of Pepsi

Posts: 622 | Subs: 1

So, is the game good yet ?
15 Oct 2015, 10:11 AM
#78
avatar of AngryKitten465

Posts: 473

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 09:40 AMKatitof

I'll give you some time to figure it out by yourself.
Take your time, think slowly and you might get it eventually.
Nuclear Arbitors post is your hint.


Can you give an answer or not?

Whining about allied units is getting old Katifkof.
15 Oct 2015, 10:38 AM
#79
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1



Can you give an answer or not?

Whining about allied units is getting old Katifkof.


It would be wise not to argue mate...
15 Oct 2015, 10:43 AM
#80
avatar of AngryKitten465

Posts: 473

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 10:38 AMRMMLz


It would be wise not to argue mate...


Sst, he is taking the bait :megusta:
PAGES (9)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

972 users are online: 1 member and 971 guests
zhcnwps
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49104
Welcome our newest member, zhcnwps
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM