Its apsurd, players have started building pak emplacments behind buildings to protect them as they can shoot through every building.
Fix asap please.
Pak 43 shooting through buildings
12 Oct 2015, 08:46 AM
#1
Posts: 7
12 Oct 2015, 08:51 AM
#2
1 
Posts: 764
This is an intended feature, not a bug.
12 Oct 2015, 08:55 AM
#3
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Just how new are you to the game?
If you need to know stats of certain unit: http://stat.coh2.hu
Which faction is OP and which is UP? Check it out here
Tips for beginners and wannabe pro's
Which faction is OP and which is UP? Check it out here
Tips for beginners and wannabe pro's
12 Oct 2015, 09:15 AM
#4
Posts: 1740
If they take the PaK43's ability to shoot through obstacles, it will be absolutely crap. It's already a hard to use unit that lacks the range it has had in earlier stages of the game (70 now, 100 before) and can be simply countered by a lot of 1 click abilities.
I would say the PaK43 is currently oooookay... or rather a bit UP IMO.
I would say the PaK43 is currently oooookay... or rather a bit UP IMO.
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
12 Oct 2015, 09:28 AM
#5
Posts: 334
Can the 17pdr do the same too? And let it not be a timed vet 1 ability that costs muni.
12 Oct 2015, 09:29 AM
#6
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Can the 17pdr do the same too? And let it not be a timed vet 1 ability that costs muni.
No because axis are so Elite and kewl. They are the only ones Who get all ze nice stuff
12 Oct 2015, 09:32 AM
#7
Posts: 334
No because axis are so Elite and kewl. They are the only ones Who get all ze nice stuff
Yeah of course. How could I be so naive...
12 Oct 2015, 09:37 AM
#8
Posts: 323
QF17 cost 400 MP and 75 FU got brace, and can be garrisoned to be more effective
PAK cost 600 MP, no brace, no garrison
Axis don't always have the "best stuff"
PAK cost 600 MP, no brace, no garrison
Axis don't always have the "best stuff"
12 Oct 2015, 09:51 AM
#10
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
No because axis are so Elite and kewl. They are the only ones Who get all ze nice stuff
Dude, stop with these semi-sarcastic smart-ass looking posts. Despite its flaws (Whole emplacements are UP), 17pdr has a very important feature, its crew can not die, and also its arc.
With the abundance of indirect fire and 1-click doomsday abilities, countering a PaK43 is not that hard. PaK43 is fine.
12 Oct 2015, 09:59 AM
#11
Posts: 1740
No because axis are so Elite and kewl. They are the only ones Who get all ze nice stuff
Currently cool allied stuff:
Churchill Crocodile, Centaur, Air Superiority, Flamer Rifles, Pak Howie
Past cool allied stuff:
Commandos, Partisans, ISU-152, Old and new KV-8, 120mm mortar, old Guards, old SU-85, Katjusha, Vickers in Buildings, P47 strafe, Bofors, Flak M5, Field HQ rush
Currently cool axis stuff:
Tiger Ace, LeIG, Ost Sniper, Tank Smoke
Past cool axis stuff:
Close Air Support, StuG E, Stug G, Flame 251 (some weeks after CoH2 release), Elite Troops Doctrine, Königskübel, Blitzkrieg Ability
Explanation:
Cool = OP
So you see every faction has and had its OP stuff (and as a good German I'm convinced that OST and OKW had much less OP stuff over the time
).But still the PaK43 is everything but OP.
It doesn't change the fact that the Brit Pounder Emplacement sucks ass. But only because the one faction has a sucky emplacement doesn't mean that the other one has to suck that bad too.
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
12 Oct 2015, 10:36 AM
#12
Posts: 1653
remove the ability and it's useless. It can be countered to soo many stuff. It's not like the 17 pounder that can't be recrewed.
12 Oct 2015, 10:50 AM
#13
Posts: 323 | Subs: 1
No because axis are so Elite and kewl. They are the only ones Who get all ze nice stuff
you are wrong the 17p can shoot trough building though you got to use his special ability which allows it to shoot trough most object including buildings which i tried out my self
12 Oct 2015, 11:32 AM
#14
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
pak43 is completely fine
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
12 Oct 2015, 11:56 AM
#15
1 Posts: 412
If they take the PaK43's ability to shoot through obstacles, it will be absolutely crap. It's already a hard to use unit that lacks the range it has had in earlier stages of the game (70 now, 100 before) and can be simply countered by a lot of 1 click abilities.
I would say the PaK43 is currently oooookay... or rather a bit UP IMO.
Like all static emplacements. There are too many easy counters to them.
12 Oct 2015, 11:59 AM
#16
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Troll thread.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
13 Oct 2015, 12:44 PM
#17
Posts: 7
this isn't about unit sucking or not, it's about shooting through buildings, which is utterly ridiculous. Also german panzerfaust ability shoots through buildings if the opponent activates it on my vehicle before it drives around the corner. I repeat, utterly ridiculous.
13 Oct 2015, 12:49 PM
#18
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
QF17 cost 400 MP and 75 FU got brace, and can be garrisoned to be more effective
You know that garrison bonus of 17 pounder is the ability to use flare, right? Hardly "more effective" with that.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
13 Oct 2015, 13:02 PM
#19
Posts: 515
Being able to shoot through buildings is the only thing the PaK43 has going for it. Even then, neither I nor any high skilled players I watch ever build it since there are soooo many units and abilities that wipe kill it or decrew it. Unit is fine. Feature intended.
13 Oct 2015, 13:03 PM
#20
Posts: 7
You know that garrison bonus of 17 pounder is the ability to use flare, right? Hardly "more effective" with that.
with requirement brit_17_pounder_hold_full:
Reload -33%
Horizontal speed *2
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
380 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
1074 users are online:
1074 guests
0 post in the last 24h
11 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
11 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49992
Welcome our newest member, xewiy33830
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, xewiy33830
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM