No, can KV were only used on the beginnig of the war, production stopped early in favor of t34 (if my memory is right)
Tanks themselves were still used and modified to a point(KV-1s, KV-85).
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
No, can KV were only used on the beginnig of the war, production stopped early in favor of t34 (if my memory is right)
Posts: 4928
Why axis can callin puma, stug, command tank, tiger without spending on tier? I would like tie all tanks to buiildings.
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Puma and StuG E have no corresponding tier, Ostheer skips over light armour phase and jumps straight into medium armour. Putting them in T2 would be too early, but putting them in T3 would be too late.
Posts: 600
No, can KV were only used on the beginnig of the war, production stopped early in favor of t34 (if my memory is right)
Posts: 928
There are people here who have much more experience than you in 1v1 complaining about the KV-8 balance. You're L2P comment isn't justified. You give no reasons why it's balanced. Flame damage is too powerful and it will be adjusted in the future.
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
m3 flamer could do the same thing until the flamer changes.
Posts: 928
So we can safely agree that "if" HP is based on weight in this game then KV-1,8,2 should have more health than the IS-2 because KV-1 = 47.5 t while IS-2 was 46 tonns
Also KV tanks were used almost throughout the whole war from 40-44
Posts: 89
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Problem is not KV-8 alone, wich is strong on itself, but the doctrine as whole is too good, covers all areas of the game.
Posts: 89
Posts: 54
No, can KV were only used on the beginnig of the war, production stopped early in favor of t34 (if my memory is right)
Posts: 928
Posts: 503
Posts: 692
Posts: 143
Posts: 503
Yep, damage was never an issue to begin with. TIMING, POPCAP AND COST WERE OFF
Also shock frontline is another clusterfuck of its own. Bye Bye KV8
Posts: 143
8 | |||||
38 | |||||
13 |