Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
105/120/135 penetration is not regularly penetrating panther front armor.
Because after you've successfully flanked a churchill you face probably an other good at option which UKF has. -.-
Posts: 87
Can my tiger tank also soak up that much dmg for it's cost?
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
| | acceleration: 3.5f;
| | deceleration: 3.5f;
| | acceleration: 1.4f;
| | deceleration: 1.8f;
| | acceleration: 1.5f;
| | deceleration: 1.8f;
| | acceleration: 2.1f;
| | deceleration: 4.3f;
| | acceleration: 3.2f;
| | deceleration: 4.4f;
1 
Posts: 144
Posts: 218
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I have never seen a Churchill nade fail to wipe a squad. Ever. Pak? *blam* dead. Grenadier squad trying to faust? *blam* dead. Flamer or Mg in church? *blam* dead.
They're like Satchels or gammon bombs with less SFX.
Posts: 2779
The stock Churchill HP should be decreased to 1280, and cost increased to 180 fuel. Yes it really needs a heavy nerf. Churchill spam ruined late team games. Just no fun to play against the Churchill spam.
Posts: 315
It is laughable, God forbid Allies having a tank that can stand longer than 10 seconds?
Axis got no Ele, Jadgtiger in late teamgame? So tell me how do Churchill "spam" roll over the Jadg?
Posts: 46
Posts: 1653
why do i have the feeling you were a big fan of the old Tiger Ace
I wasnt a huge fan of killing my economy for 1 tank Posts: 1653
That's because Relic messed up and made it's near distance damage the exact same as it's Radius (4) so it does 120 damage perfectly in a radius of 4 from it's explosion center. Also it's classified as light artillery for ~reasons~
So yeah it's basically a gammon bomb but with a better AoE profile
4 
Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
Nicely put, good sir. I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
The HP is just unreasonable, no tank should have above 1280. That simple.
Posts: 315
Big difference between "working to kill a tank" and combating often multiple 1600 hp "cheap-ish" tanks backed by fireflies.
Try a pak wall vs a croc and see how that works for you.
I was not aware allied tanks are so bad that they require a minimum of 1400 to 1600 HP to be considered viable.
The HP is just unreasonable, no tank should have above 1280. That simple.
8 Posts: 2470
Posts: 218
Churchills are fine. the variants may be a bit much due to having functional weapons but the base version is doesn't actually kill anything.Other than any weapon team it sees, sure.
8 Posts: 2470
Other than any weapon team it sees, sure.
Posts: 218
What? It has the fuse of a standard infantry grenade, less than a second. You can't dodge because your squad literally cannot move out of the kill radius before it goes off, even if you start moving the second you see the hatch come open- the equivalent to a throw animation.
if you're losing weapon teams to a churchill then you need to practice positioning and support. that nade takes forever to go off.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
if you're losing weapon teams to a churchill then you need to practice positioning and support. that nade takes forever to go off.
8 Posts: 2470
Posts: 218
they take forever to fire though and have a tiny range on top of the churchill being slow as fuck. just back up, it won't hit anything moving. it is a strong ability but it's easier to dodge then any other grenade.Churchill has better acceleration than an M10, as Alex will be quick to tell you. It's a lot more agile than you'd think.
 |
|
|
5 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
