Login

russian armor

DevM vs Aimstrong Conspiracy Theory

27 Sep 2015, 23:06 PM
#21
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
Did Quentin create another smurf in Coh2 ? :D
27 Sep 2015, 23:12 PM
#22
28 Sep 2015, 09:28 AM
#23
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164

I write as a member here, not as an Admin

If it goes to the vote, as I hope it may, the results to date tell me we should not not seed again in a big event, in this way. In other words, we take the Cruzz way (not the Conway)... fight through, from start to finish...everybody.

And yes, I did support the idea of seeding...:blush:


If y seeding you mean giving 4 players a free seed / invite to the main round... yeah, that's fairly dumb. If you are talking about not creating the brackets according to a rank-inspired seeding... that would be even worse.

Want i'd like to know is how those 4 were chosen, and why.
28 Sep 2015, 09:40 AM
#24
avatar of SirRaven of Coventry

Posts: 167

Permanently Banned
I write as a member here, not as an Admin

If it goes to the vote, as I hope it may, the results to date tell me we should not not seed again in a big event, in this way. In other words, we take the Cruzz way (not the Conway)... fight through, from start to finish...everybody.

And yes, I did support the idea of seeding...:blush:


Agreed.

An honest man goes the extra mile!
28 Sep 2015, 09:41 AM
#25
avatar of Swift

Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1

Meanwhile in a parallel universe...

DKDK + PTPT = $$$$$$
28 Sep 2015, 09:42 AM
#26
avatar of Kreatiir

Posts: 2819

28 Sep 2015, 11:56 AM
#27
avatar of littlebirdie

Posts: 34

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Sep 2015, 09:28 AMcr4wler



Want i'd like to know is how those 4 were chosen, and why.


There was a thought process behind it, I just can't say on what thread it is. Ami did discuss this in the very beginning of OCF. But, it went like this (paraphrased): the four chosen invites were based on past tournament wins and their current place on the ladder. A value was placed on what SNF they won and their current ranking. Multiple tournament wins and placings had the highest value followed by ladder ranks. Some people did mention they thought Barton should have gotten an invite. He almost did, but was beaten out by someone based on ladder ranks as tournament wins was comparable.
28 Sep 2015, 13:14 PM
#28
avatar of Spanky
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1820 | Subs: 2



There was a thought process behind it, I just can't say on what thread it is. Ami did discuss this in the very beginning of OCF. But, it went like this (paraphrased): the four chosen invites were based on past tournament wins and their current place on the ladder. A value was placed on what SNF they won and their current ranking. Multiple tournament wins and placings had the highest value followed by ladder ranks. Some people did mention they thought Barton should have gotten an invite. He almost did, but was beaten out by someone based on ladder ranks as tournament wins was comparable.


This.
28 Sep 2015, 13:16 PM
#29
avatar of cr4wler

Posts: 1164



There was a thought process behind it, I just can't say on what thread it is. Ami did discuss this in the very beginning of OCF. But, it went like this (paraphrased): the four chosen invites were based on past tournament wins and their current place on the ladder. A value was placed on what SNF they won and their current ranking. Multiple tournament wins and placings had the highest value followed by ladder ranks. Some people did mention they thought Barton should have gotten an invite. He almost did, but was beaten out by someone based on ladder ranks as tournament wins was comparable.


yeah, already thought it was tournament wins... the problem always is though, no matter what format you use, it's always going to be flawed in some regard... which is why i think that "open quali" is the best format to use, with brackets seeded according to ladder rank (so you don't have the best players facing off in the first rounds).
28 Sep 2015, 13:23 PM
#30
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

It's obviously a jewish fascist muslim alien plot to destroy all common liberties and coh 2 esports on the planet.


Only Dane can help us now.
28 Sep 2015, 13:37 PM
#31
avatar of Stormless
Senior Caster Badge

Posts: 762 | Subs: 4

I would like to add to this btw that DevM has trashed PaulA in EVERY ladder game they get. On DevM's stream ive seen him get PaulA 5 times in a row lol and ace him.

I was 'shocked' to see DevM lose
28 Sep 2015, 13:39 PM
#32
avatar of keithsboredom

Posts: 117

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Sep 2015, 09:28 AMcr4wler


If y seeding you mean giving 4 players a free seed / invite to the main round... yeah, that's fairly dumb. If you are talking about not creating the brackets according to a rank-inspired seeding... that would be even worse.


this.
28 Sep 2015, 14:00 PM
#33
avatar of voltardark

Posts: 976

Everyone fight to the end is a better way as it help to minimize such sad comments.

But remember that people are people and that some are jealous and some are greedy or both :(.

Charlie-Fox is a great success ! Never bother with such comments as they happen all the time.

No big fuss here.
28 Sep 2015, 14:58 PM
#34
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 26

At the end of the day I also think OCF is a huge success, I'm hoping to see DevM beat OMGPOP and can't wait to see the finals between Aimstrong and DevM no matter if DevM lost on purpose beforehand or not. Master of UKF vs. God of USF (unfortunately not applicable)
28 Sep 2015, 18:18 PM
#35
avatar of CieZ

Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4

OP obviously has no clue how double-elim works.

Even in the winner's bracket they wouldn't play each other until the finals.

/threadDebunked

0/10 bad troll

I'm also not really sure why so many people are bashing Paul. He's generally nice to me (unless he is in fact KimJung). He is a bit toxic/hateful towards some players but it's not like he's leagues behind DevM in terms of skill. I'd like to see anyone who is bashing Paul try to beat him in a Bo3.

Say what you want about his manners. He's a skilled player.
28 Sep 2015, 18:36 PM
#36
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 26

They would have met at Winner's Bracket Final (semi finals) already. Of course double elimination would allow another meet up in Grand Finals.

It has nothing to do with trolling. It deserves "objective" speculation.

Paul has literally been pwned by DevM multiple times beforehand. I suppose the community would agree on a skill difference between DevM and Paul (He is really good though) and also on Paul not being one of the friendliest players. Obviously he is being nice to you, perhaps to Ami, Seb and all other important staffs as well.
28 Sep 2015, 19:07 PM
#37
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Sep 2015, 18:18 PMCieZ
OP obviously has no clue how double-elim works.

Even in the winner's bracket they wouldn't play each other until the finals.

/threadDebunked

0/10 bad troll

I'm also not really sure why so many people are bashing Paul. He's generally nice to me (unless he is in fact KimJung). He is a bit toxic/hateful towards some players but it's not like he's leagues behind DevM in terms of skill. I'd like to see anyone who is bashing Paul try to beat him in a Bo3.

Say what you want about his manners. He's a skilled player.


+1

AFAIK, Paul is not KimJung, though the two have close associations.. HOI sauce springs to mind ;)
28 Sep 2015, 20:00 PM
#38
avatar of spam.r33k

Posts: 503

i love paul (sinophile here) and i love aimstrong (looks good, plays well... what else matters?)
am i a bad person?
28 Sep 2015, 21:51 PM
#39
avatar of Marcus2389
Developer Relic Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 4559 | Subs: 2

Sry Sebbro, I have to do this:

20:24 - Insane Marcus2389: time for predictions, who you think will win?
20:24 - Insane Marcus2389: i think you'll go for aimstrong
20:24 - Seb: yes
20:24 - Insane Marcus2389: you think 2-0 or 2-1?
20:24 - Insane Marcus2389: or it's a bo5?
20:25 - Seb: 3-1
20:26 - Insane Marcus2389: i say 3-2 for devm


Looks like Marco was right!!!!!!! :D WP DevM, WP Aimstrong, great show! :)
Seb
28 Sep 2015, 21:57 PM
#40
avatar of Seb
Admin Black Badge

Posts: 3709 | Subs: 2

1. There is no proof this is real.

2. How about you quote the 2 times I wanted and predicted the two of them in finals.

3. Brit and Centaur not OP enough please buff.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
Last Thursday, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
Last Thursday, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
Last Thursday, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
Last Thursday, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
Last Thursday, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
Last Tuesday, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
Last Monday, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM

Livestreams

unknown 96
Germany 551
Germany 16
unknown 2
unknown 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

679 users are online: 679 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
11 posts in the last week
72 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53046
Welcome our newest member, go88clubart
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM