Would you like to see AngryJoe get more involved with COH2?
Posts: 657
Posts: 113
Giving some more main stream exposure to a niche game like CoH2 is a positive thing, IMO. And if it brings in new people to the community, Joe included, I think that'd be awesome.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 657
In the current state of the game? No.I think more of his involvement would cause Relic to actually take into consideration our balance complaints and our recommendations and less over the top BS to avoid bad publicity.
Posts: 70
I think more of his involvement would cause Relic to actually take into consideration our balance complaints and our recommendations and less over the top BS to avoid bad publicity.
Agree.
Posts: 505
the weight his views carry, coupled with his stance on the monetisation model could be very beneficial (not for Relic) but for the rest of the community.
Posts: 169
Posts: 4928
In the current state of the game? No.
The game is in great shape right now, the main problems are Bugs, Brits, and over Buffs.
Fix the game-breaking bugs they keep introducing, make the Brits less bipolar (UP and OP, like old OKW) and knock Riflemen and Conscripts Vet 3 received accuracy vet back a few numbers. Then things will really shine.
Posts: 559
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
There is no such thing as bad publicity.
Well, not really.
You can do some controversy in the game and that=free advertisement, but if something is bad in the game and the word spreads, a lot of potential players might not even try the game in the first place.
Posts: 81
Permanently BannedI think more of his involvement would cause Relic to actually take into consideration our balance complaints and our recommendations and less over the top BS to avoid bad publicity.
This statement just shows how sad the situation actually has become
Posts: 559
Well, not really.
You can do some controversy in the game and that=free advertisement, but if something is bad in the game and the word spreads, a lot of potential players might not even try the game in the first place.
That makes no sense. If someone doesn't try the game cause of bad publicity, how is that any different from the same person not buying it cause they never hear of it?
In both cases, they don't try it right? So bad publicity makes no difference in this scenario.
Meanwhile, the other people who ignore the bad publicity and try it are folks who are added to the game population that otherwise wouldn't be there because they would never have heard of it.
Posts: 205
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
The game is in great shape right now, the main problems are Bugs, Brits, and over Buffs.
Fix the game-breaking bugs they keep introducing, make the Brits less bipolar (UP and OP, like old OKW) and knock Riflemen and Conscripts Vet 3 received accuracy vet back a few numbers. Then things will really shine.
Yes the game is in an excellent state right now except for all the things that make it a hot mess.
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1653
Posts: 600
Posts: 505
AngryJoe lel... It`s better to ask someone who enjoys RTS and plays them competitively to stream the game or review it. Instead of a guy who gets paid to review games.
Which kind of person watches the stream of someone who plays strategy games and doesn't already know about CoH in at least some capacity?
I think the point is with AJ streaming it is that on his stream there probably are a lot of people unfamiliar with CoH and therefore its good for getting publicity to a wider audience.
Agree with Basilone though, I'd love more popularity to come as a result of this but AJ will probably stop playing in a week.
Inb4 he's top 10 all factions.
Posts: 4928
Yes the game is in an excellent state right now except for all the things that make it a hot mess.
Well if you want to take such a negative view, you won't find any positivity in life.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Which kind of person watches the stream of someone who plays strategy games and doesn't already know about CoH in at least some capacity?
Millions upon millions of SC2 fanboys?
Though that is a rather close minded target.
Livestreams
95 | |||||
2 | |||||
147 | |||||
99 | |||||
25 | |||||
19 | |||||
11 | |||||
6 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.840223.790+3
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.927408.694+1
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.306114.729+2
- 9.1123623.643+4
- 10.266140.655+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger