Rofl. So you're saying that because my opponent MIGHT go Commandos doctrine I should not utilize my trucks the way Relic intended them? And please don't put up a BS argument that they can be put in the base because if they were designed not to be deployed in forward positions, Relic would've restricted them to be deploy-able in the base territory. Jesus Christ Katitof, where does the bias end with you?
No, I'm saying you need to reconsider that possibility and decide if its worth it for you.
You know, the exactly same decision brits have to make before building emplacement or soviets before building ML-20 or B4.
And please don't say that it costs 325 munitions so the end result is justified. That's equivalent to saying that a player who manages to float 700 munitions should be able to call in a nuke strike for auto win. FailFish
I find this part extremely hilarious, because you've just described OKW scavenge doc arty at its prime against USF, one shooting whole USF base
And brits aren't exactly muni floating army, forgo spending muni and watch yourself base locked.
Additionally to that, I understand that you are in deep support of preventing stuka dive bomb from one shooting ML-20 and B4 as well as from incendiary round one shooting emplacements and forward assemblies for the balance consistency, because there is no reason why one should survive and another not as all of it are expensive investments that put a strain on the players economy.