Login

russian armor

Why should 17P cost fuel and cannot shoot through wall?

17 Sep 2015, 19:18 PM
#21
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 14:06 PMluvnest
I would rather decrease the MP cost of Pak43 and the LeFH and add a fuel cost to be in line with the Brits emplacements.



Aslong as they get brace. :P

And arnt de-crewed in 2 sniper shots or 1 molly..


jump backJump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 15:18 PMKatitof

Ost ostwind and OKW ostwind cost the same, one is doctrinal one is not.
OKW one isn't cheaper because its doctrinal.


Just saying somewhat related example for the argument.




100 OKW fuel is still worth more than 100 Wehrmacht fuel. The doctrinal one is more expensive (objectively) because of its 5 possible vet levels.
17 Sep 2015, 19:26 PM
#22
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

Waiting for Relic to overbuff 17 pounder in 6 months when they realize that nobody is building it :foreveralone:
17 Sep 2015, 19:50 PM
#23
avatar of RPhilMan1

Posts: 106

Waiting for Relic to overbuff 17 pounder in 6 months when they realize that nobody is building it :foreveralone:


Changelog for March 17th Patch

UKF
We found the 17-Pounder to be underutilized and it underperforms for its cost. By increasing the damage, this emplacement is more viable to use as a stationary tank-killing platform as its 20 population hinders the rest of the faction's mobile force
  • QF 17-Pounder Emplacement damage increased from 320 to 450
17 Sep 2015, 21:01 PM
#24
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 14:06 PMluvnest
I would rather decrease the MP cost of Pak43 and the LeFH and add a fuel cost to be in line with the Brits emplacements.


The problem is the Emplacements are completely different. British Emplacements are built to last, they die quickly because Ost and OKW pull significant resources to kill them. On the other hand, the Pak 43 can be decrewed by light artillery fire or small arms fire, and can even by 1v1'd by a Churchill Crocodile or A.V.R.E. Try using a Sturmtiger against a 17 Pounder, at best you get away with a damaged tank and the emplacement is still alive (braced, the only reason you got away).
17 Sep 2015, 21:08 PM
#25
avatar of Kamzil118

Posts: 455



Changelog for March 17th Patch

UKF
We found the 17-Pounder to be underutilized and it underperforms for its cost. By increasing the damage, this emplacement is more viable to use as a stationary tank-killing platform as its 20 population hinders the rest of the faction's mobile force
  • QF 17-Pounder Emplacement damage increased from 320 to 450


I can't wait to use it in team games.
17 Sep 2015, 21:27 PM
#26
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

20 popcap is wtf really. a fifth of popcap that has to be at one place. rear enough to protect but forward enough to deal shots. which means an active 17 pounder will always will be in range of light indirect fire, which all emplacements are very susceptable to. 20 popcap is way too much imo.
DeC
17 Sep 2015, 21:33 PM
#27
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102



+1 a small fart and every ones dead
Don't let others to fart ob you.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 20
Netherlands 12
Russian Federation 177
Sweden 12

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

948 users are online: 1 member and 947 guests
lukei
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48778
Welcome our newest member, Rrdcxsdfvf
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM