Login

russian armor

Give the KV2 some love relic!!

15 Sep 2015, 15:44 PM
#1
avatar of Trianq
Donator 11

Posts: 31 | Subs: 1

This doctrine as a whole has been overlooked for a while now. What do you guys think about it?
15 Sep 2015, 15:47 PM
#2
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

this doctrine needs a proper overhaul
15 Sep 2015, 15:57 PM
#3
avatar of Gecko2k3

Posts: 91

Yes God Lee. Check this thread. Give some love to the KV2 + Soviet industry.

And to the KV1 too :)

15 Sep 2015, 15:59 PM
#4
avatar of Airborne

Posts: 281

Yes, please. It isn't really terrible but the commander is.
15 Sep 2015, 16:01 PM
#5
avatar of Kreatiir

Posts: 2819

I'd put it in the T4 of soviets or in the T0 building.
Like the King Tiger.

15 Sep 2015, 16:02 PM
#6
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

Yes it is sad doctrine with sad havy tank. Soviet Industry is main problem here. For all KVs I would like to see small hp buff (+1 shot for standard AT, 960-1000hp), even if it means new cost and CP values. KV-2 could be interesting if it will be more like AVRE.
15 Sep 2015, 16:06 PM
#7
avatar of CadianGuardsman

Posts: 348

I'd put it in the T4 of soviets or in the T0 building.
Like the King Tiger.



I disagree. The non call in heavy should be unique to the OKW - The KV-2 just needs it's commander to be improved.
15 Sep 2015, 16:10 PM
#8
avatar of Airborne

Posts: 281

KV-1 should be more like the Churchil, limit it to one and increase cost but increase hp to 1040 and a armor buff.
15 Sep 2015, 16:13 PM
#9
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

1.The commander is shit
2.The unit is shit

For the commander I would suggest MP to fuel conversion ability instead.
For the unit, change Siege mode to Artillery mode, like priest.
15 Sep 2015, 16:15 PM
#10
avatar of Plaguer

Posts: 498

Imo the KV2 is fine for the offensive part but it just doesn't have enough hp, 800 hp for a expensive heavy call in is not even close to enough

But for the most part the doctirne kills this unit completely, would love to see this unit in a working commander
15 Sep 2015, 16:18 PM
#11
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

Make it a Tiger Ace :snfPeter:
15 Sep 2015, 16:23 PM
#12
avatar of Crecer13

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

I do not understand why the KV-2 was added to the multiplayer. Almost all of the KV-2 was lost in 1941, it was very slow and unreliable. Given the fact that the multiplayer is happening in 1943-1944.may be SU-122 would be more appropriate.
15 Sep 2015, 16:37 PM
#13
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
Agree, more love for Losedustry and kv-2 Kappa.
15 Sep 2015, 16:45 PM
#14
avatar of Switzerland
Donator 33

Posts: 545

+1 for this and KV1. More options vs always seeing T34/85, IS2 and IS152.
15 Sep 2015, 21:03 PM
#15
avatar of Flying Dustbin

Posts: 270 | Subs: 1

They gave Partisans a nice rework completely unprovoked.
Hopefully they do the same to the old "paid to win" (past tense because they're shit now) commanders like counter-attack tactics and Soviet industry
15 Sep 2015, 21:34 PM
#16
avatar of Nilon

Posts: 68

btw the KV-2 is the only heavy who didnt get pop cap reduced. The forgotten doctrine :(
15 Sep 2015, 22:08 PM
#17
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

KV-1 should be more like the Churchil, limit it to one and increase cost but increase hp to 1040 and a armor buff.

Who and why would but it with its pea shooter, inaccurate gun with any kind of a limit?
17 Sep 2015, 13:27 PM
#18
avatar of Deca

Posts: 63

KV-2 def needs a boost.

Also, the doctrine itself is distinctly lacklustre. An easy fix at some improvement would be for it to grant every vehicle a -10% popcap.
17 Sep 2015, 13:36 PM
#19
avatar of Don'tKnow

Posts: 225 | Subs: 1

Last Relic stream i asked them and they said that they are planning to take a look at the whole doctrine,not only the KV-2.

The questions still is when and if they are doing so.
17 Sep 2015, 14:05 PM
#20
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

Last Relic stream i asked them and they said that they are planning to take a look at the whole doctrine,not only the KV-2.

The questions still is when and if they are doing so.


It's good to hear they are considering it at least.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

916 users are online: 916 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49115
Welcome our newest member, Pound309
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM