Login

russian armor

Centaur OP

16 Sep 2015, 23:54 PM
#61
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Sep 2015, 21:01 PMDeC
That's only possible if you pickup luftwaffe fuel supply drops.


How much fuel does UKF start with?

UKF:
30 + 115 - (x) = 145 in tech. (x) been initial fuel
100 for the Centaur / 110 for Cromwell
15/15/25 Upgrades (Nade/Rack/Bolster)

OH:
170f in tech (accounting for initial fuel)
100 for Ostwind / 125f PIV

SU:
170f in tech (accounting for initial fuel)
80f for T34
25/25 Upgrades (Molo/AT nade)

23f average for a 50/50 control map (4SP + 1fuel + Base). Should you add 1/2 cache, have a better presence on the map and you can put out a 10-12 min Centaur without problem.

Nade (which is a lackluster upgrade) should be fused with Bolster and Tank tier could be 10-25f more expensive (tech is gonna be -5f next patch)
DeC
17 Sep 2015, 00:11 AM
#62
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102




23f average for a 50/50 control map (4SP + 1fuel + Base). Should you add 1/2 cache, have a better presence on the map and you can put out a 10-12 min Centaur without problem.


That's the point. Against the btits you should easily dominate and own 3/4 of the map for a good 10-15 minutes.
17 Sep 2015, 00:29 AM
#63
avatar of pugzii

Posts: 513



target tables?????????


Target Tables effect damage.

On topic: Centaur is shit, stop whining coz your retreating shreck blob ran into it.
17 Sep 2015, 03:50 AM
#64
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 00:11 AMDeC
That's the point. Against the btits you should easily dominate and own 3/4 of the map for a good 10-15 minutes.


I figure it out that on teamgames, you can rely on SU or USF to do that for you.
17 Sep 2015, 08:39 AM
#65
avatar of PanzerKampf

Posts: 266 | Subs: 1

By the time a centaur hits the field, you should have some kind of AT ready. It's not much different than like a ostwind or anything.


Except Ostwind doesn't wipe out squads in 3 seconds like OPCentaur does. Bias much?
17 Sep 2015, 08:59 AM
#66
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

By the time a centaur hits the field, you should have some kind of AT ready. It's not much different than like a ostwind or anything.


Good thing the Centaur easily counters those pesky AT Guns that were foolish enough to think they could kill it. Unlike the Ostwind, which is right fucked if it parks infront of a ZiS.
17 Sep 2015, 12:27 PM
#67
avatar of Yunohh
Patrion 26

Posts: 33

I use the centaur every game at the moment. I love it, but it is clearly over performing against infantry in terms of DPS - it vaporises targeted squads at an alarming speed, leaving no time to retreat, and will usually wipe them anyway. As for people claiming it can solo multiple paks, they're either talking out of their asses, or facing one buffed by a command vehicle (which is being nerfed today). This tank has 640 HP, same as ostwind, that's 4 pak hits. It can wipe a raketten frontally in one burst (which says as much about the raketten as the centaur), paks usually take 2 bursts from the front, one from the rear.

Personally I think this thing could do with a splash damage reduction to bring the DPS to somewhere between the ostwind and it's current levels.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

579 users are online: 579 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49851
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM