Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Do Tiger buffs apply to the Tiger Ace?
Tiger Ace with 55 range and even more penetration is the last thing I want to see in this game.
bofors and brace structure changes are great, Sherman with increased armor was a better version of P4 with cheaper price, so not including the armor buffs in new mod version is good imo.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 589
Tiger ace is completely different unit, so its only logical to say the changes do not apply to it.
Posts: 393
is it only me or do you need to activate the UKFs smoke rounds twice for them to actually be fired?No, you aren't the only one. Though I did try to replicate it to see what causes it. In the controlled test, it fires off just fine every single time. But for some reason, it hesitates a lot in the heat of battle, when I need it most...
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 393
Good pick. I would also like to see that doctrine work. I guess everybody gave up on it and even stopped talking about it.I've experimented with the Soviet Defensive Doctrine before and I grew to like it. They are capable of causing the Axis a few headaches with their Tank Traps and Mines.
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
My wishlist:
Add Sdkfz 221 to Wehrmacht Tier1 building, 240mp 20fuel, armor same as soviet m3.Excel at killing sniper and can kill bren with sufficient micro(as CoH1 PE Scout Car). Also has good sight for late game usefulness.
Posts: 503
No, you aren't the only one. Though I did try to replicate it to see what causes it. In the controlled test, it fires off just fine every single time. But for some reason, it hesitates a lot in the heat of battle, when I need it most...
Posts: 747 | Subs: 2
Tiger with vet 2 has 50 range. Its ok.
Buff to 45 is also most welcome.
But vet 2 with 45 base means over 56 range and this is not good solution.
45 but lower vet 2 buff.
 | Playercard of RedT3rror | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 978
The vet guide says it gets +20% range, so it´s going to have 56.25 range at vet 2. I like that idea. It´s how Tigers should be used. That´s kinda the tradeoff for being pretty easy to kill compared to the IS-2. They already stripped the tiger of any defensive buff with vet and lowered the health.
It makes me wonder wether the vet bonus applied with % values or with specific values. If it is based on % values, then goodbye Jackson (60range).
1 Posts: 21
well, why Brits economy hasnt changed? why tommies costs 280, reinf 35 and has literally no early counter to snipers? [...] why bren carrier requires god damn vet 1 to self repair? this makes unit useless in early stages till some engies come. And for the last, why the hell brits don't have normal early vehicle or light tank like stuart? (AEC doesnt count, it's crap)
usf 
soviets \
/ 
ostheer 
okw
Posts: 134
1 
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedThe new Tiger I should just get skirts or w/e at Vet 2 instead of a range increase. Would help make it different from the IS2 and make it more consistent with the rest of Ostheer's vehicles vet.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
Posts: 354
Posts: 1217
The tiger at vet 2(including the ace) has a solid modifier OF 10 for its range increase. Not a set multiplicative percentage.That wouldn´t make sense. Currently even a vetted Tiger is underwhelming. To just buff it, to then nerf the vet bonuses is not what this unit needs. Sure, you have more range on vet 0 and 1 but that´s hardly of any use.
So really they should just lower that modifier to 5.
1 Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
That wouldn´t make sense. Currently even a vetted Tiger is underwhelming. To just buff it, to then nerf the vet bonuses is not what this unit needs. Sure, you have more range on vet 0 and 1 but that´s hardly of any use.
The combination of the 45 range and the +10 range on vet is what would actually make the unit useful!
There aren´t going to be overpowered Tigers everywhere on the field. It first needs to gain vet. There are going to be players who are rewarded for keeping the unit alive.
On the contrary I would suggest giving the IS-2 200 dmg.
Posts: 4928
The new Tiger I should just get skirts or w/e at Vet 2 instead of a range increase. Would help make it different from the IS2 and make it more consistent with the rest of Ostheer's vehicles vet.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
I guess....since they're limited to one now.
But dont forget USF here,what do they do vs a vet 2 tiger? surrender?
 |
|
|
67 | ||
|
|
|
|
37 | ||
 |
|
|
35 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
635 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
