Why would they waste money on an alpha then?
Because later this waste will pay off.
I predict an OP faction that will suffer changes/nerfs in the next months after release related to around 50% of its units/features. You heard it from me first.
UKF - infantry units
- This thread is locked
4 Aug 2015, 07:31 AM
#121
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Because later this waste will pay off.
I predict an OP faction that will suffer changes/nerfs in the next months after release related to around 50% of its units/features. You heard it from me first.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
4 Aug 2015, 07:47 AM
#122
Posts: 306
Because later this waste will pay off.
I predict an OP faction that will suffer changes/nerfs in the next months after release related to around 50% of its units/features. You heard it from me first.
Which is why the 1st 2 months will be great when smashing the shit outta new players and telling them they suck shit and to kill themselves.
Let the rage flow!
4 Aug 2015, 07:59 AM
#123
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Which is why the 1st 2 months will be great when smashing the shit outta new players and telling them they suck shit and to kill themselves.
Let the rage flow!
Exactly!
I myself will suffer a while until I will L2P against them. But I'm not afraid, I will have Ketetof telling me that I am just bad at the game, and that the UKF faction is allright.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
5 Aug 2015, 01:19 AM
#124
Posts: 503
looks like ill be exclusively playing brits, till they get readjusted to be in line (strength wise) with the other factions
how about team games? isnt it rather retarded to have one side being able to do well in the early as well as the late game (sovs + brits [lol at USF]) while the other side is only good late game? im asking here, so dont get all "meh you cant stand the idea of an late game allied faction" cause that really isnt what its all about, okay?
thank you
edit: i totally forgot that im looking at this the wrong way... most likely. there will be more changes to the existing factions, right? so assuming anything based on how brits will perform (from this thread) without considering those changes would be futlie, wouldnt it?
how about team games? isnt it rather retarded to have one side being able to do well in the early as well as the late game (sovs + brits [lol at USF]) while the other side is only good late game? im asking here, so dont get all "meh you cant stand the idea of an late game allied faction" cause that really isnt what its all about, okay?
thank you
edit: i totally forgot that im looking at this the wrong way... most likely. there will be more changes to the existing factions, right? so assuming anything based on how brits will perform (from this thread) without considering those changes would be futlie, wouldnt it?
13 Aug 2015, 22:48 PM
#125
Posts: 509
looks like ill be exclusively playing brits, till they get readjusted to be in line (strength wise) with the other factions
how about team games? isnt it rather retarded to have one side being able to do well in the early as well as the late game (sovs + brits [lol at USF]) while the other side is only good late game? im asking here, so dont get all "meh you cant stand the idea of an late game allied faction" cause that really isnt what its all about, okay?
thank you
edit: i totally forgot that im looking at this the wrong way... most likely. there will be more changes to the existing factions, right? so assuming anything based on how brits will perform (from this thread) without considering those changes would be futlie, wouldnt it?
Tbh most of the alpha changes to axis factions have already been implemented iirc. Only USF is left
14 Aug 2015, 10:19 AM
#126
Posts: 503
Tbh most of the alpha changes to axis factions have already been implemented iirc. Only USF is left
USF getting changes? thank god or once the brits hit the field we wont see them anymore
14 Aug 2015, 10:22 AM
#127
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
looks like ill be exclusively playing brits, till they get readjusted to be in line (strength wise) with the other factions
You better not be 1v1 player then.
Also, don't keep your hopes up for the USF.
There is a single change that will help then against ost and thats it.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Aug 2015, 10:56 AM
#128
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
I guess Brit will be release with a fix since 1vs1 disastrous balance Brit/Ostheer in the alpha.
Anyway, I have planned to improve my Ostheer play during the BritRush time.
Anyway, I have planned to improve my Ostheer play during the BritRush time.
14 Aug 2015, 12:15 PM
#129
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I guess Brit will be release with a fix since 1vs1 disastrous balance Brit/Ostheer in the alpha.
Anyway, I have planned to improve my Ostheer play during the BritRush time.
You'll have frequent matches with allied que becoming up to 45% after brit release
At least heavy tank lovers won't have excuse not to play allies anymore.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Aug 2015, 12:21 PM
#130
14 
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
You'll have frequent matches with allied que becoming up to 45% after brit release
.............
Depends how daring the next patch might be ...but as it stands, I agree.
14 Aug 2015, 13:27 PM
#131
Posts: 721
USF getting changes? thank god or once the brits hit the field we wont see them anymore
Yes USF are finally getting armor nerfs to Shermans and slower Jacksons because they rely on range. Other than that everything is set.
My mommy always said there were no monsters - no real ones - but there are.
16 Aug 2015, 07:33 AM
#132
Posts: 758
You better not be 1v1 player then.
Also, don't keep your hopes up for the USF.
There is a single change that will help then against ost and thats it.
makes me wonder why relic wasted money developing USF when they were garbage to begin with in the first place. what a waste...
16 Aug 2015, 08:01 AM
#133
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
Exactly!
I myself will suffer a while until I will L2P against them. But I'm not afraid, I will have Ketetof telling me that I am just bad at the game, and that the UKF faction is allright.
I never thought i will agree with you but this day happened now
16 Aug 2015, 08:41 AM
#134
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Exactly!
I myself will suffer a while until I will L2P against them. But I'm not afraid, I will have Ketetof telling me that I am just bad at the game, and that the UKF faction is allright.
There was 1 unit that was op and the rest was pretty much up, especially in 1v1 so... yea, you'll gave some L2P before QQ since QQ will be the direct result of lack of L2P.
And if you'll struggle as ost, uninstal and never come back.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
16 Aug 2015, 08:44 AM
#135
4 
Posts: 3548 | Subs: 2
There was 1 unit that was op and the rest was pretty much up, especially in 1v1 so... yea, you'll gave some L2P before QQ since QQ will be the direct result of lack of L2P.
And if you'll struggle as ost, uninstal and never come back.
Care for 'nother day in the cooler?
16 Aug 2015, 09:52 AM
#136
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
And if you'll struggle as ost, uninstal and never come back.
Well actually this sounds encouraging. I hope you're right.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
16 Aug 2015, 15:30 PM
#137
Posts: 279
This mentality of "UKF will be OP" in this thread is pretty cancerous. Whether you trust Relic to release a balanced faction or not, can we wait for it to be released before being judging it? All of you guys are talking about "OP this, UP that" like it's fact when everyone is just riding the dumb hype train from promo videos.
How about giving UKF a fair chance by going into it objectively and determining what's OP and what's UP without a precognitive bias? UKF is still a real faction that deserves to have its own strengths and weaknesses. It'd be a shame if the impending wave of butthurt prevented it from being the awesome faction it deserves to be.
How about giving UKF a fair chance by going into it objectively and determining what's OP and what's UP without a precognitive bias? UKF is still a real faction that deserves to have its own strengths and weaknesses. It'd be a shame if the impending wave of butthurt prevented it from being the awesome faction it deserves to be.
16 Aug 2015, 15:39 PM
#138
Posts: 503
This mentality of "UKF will be OP" in this thread is pretty cancerous. Whether you trust Relic to release a balanced faction or not, can we wait for it to be released before being judging it? All of you guys are talking about "OP this, UP that" like it's fact when everyone is just riding the dumb hype train from promo videos.
How about giving UKF a fair chance by going into it objectively and determining what's OP and what's UP without a precognitive bias? UKF is still a real faction that deserves to have its own strengths and weaknesses. It'd be a shame if the impending wave of butthurt prevented it from being the awesome faction it deserves to be.
no
16 Aug 2015, 16:41 PM
#139
Posts: 770
Well actually this sounds encouraging. I hope you're right.
He is right. the ukf is much more an anti okw faction. when the ukf arrive you will only need a few games to understand the weaknesses of the ukf and how the ost can easily exploit them.
16 Aug 2015, 16:43 PM
#140
Posts: 279
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.615222.735-2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
828 users are online:
828 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49138
Welcome our newest member, trevinehickman
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, trevinehickman
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM