su-76
Posts: 114
Posts: 90
also SU needs an ammo sink.
Posts: 513
Posts: 114
Posts: 600
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
I dont think its barrage should cost ammo, however i think when the tank got a HP buff it should of also received a small fuel cost increase like the StuG did.
It did got fuel cost increase.
Posts: 600
It did got fuel cost increase.
Yeah of 5... not really enough for a buff of 80 hp and DOUBLE its penetration (to 180, which is 10 less than the current stug).
Especially now it arrives alot sooner.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Yeah of 5... not really enough for a buff of 80 hp and DOUBLE its penetration (to 180, which is 10 less than the current stug).
Especially now it arrives alot sooner.
Menpower cost also got a hefty increase.
It got double penetration, because it was a TD that couldn't fight tanks. Now it can.
StuG got more buffs with survivability and armor.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Menpower cost also got a hefty increase.
It got double penetration, because it was a TD that couldn't fight tanks. Now it can.
StuG got more buffs with survivability and armor.
They didn't touch it's armor; only it's health. It's still pretty thin.
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Yeah of 5... not really enough for a buff of 80 hp and DOUBLE its penetration (to 180, which is 10 less than the current stug).
Especially now it arrives alot sooner.
It is quite pointless just to compare flat penetration values of two units from different factions because average armor values those units got to face is different for those factions.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
They didn't touch it's armor; only it's health. It's still pretty thin.
True, point for you.
Though 140 armor still isn't really that thin for 80 long range pen of allied meds.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
It is quite pointless just to compare flat penetration values of two units from different factions because average armor values those units got to face is different for those factions.
A StuG III is less likely to pen an IS2 than an SU-76 a King Tiger. A tad interesting that.
Though 140 armor still isn't really that thin for 80 long range pen of allied meds.
Since when does anyone sit in front of a StuG III to shoot at it's frontal armor unless they are using an AT gun or TD with superior range? Yes the StuG III can technically bounce frontal shots from the weakest cheapest mediums in the game but that's not a very ringing endorsement.
Posts: 770
It is quite pointless just to compare flat penetration values of two units from different factions because average armor values those units got to face is different for those factions.
Then the advantage is with the su76 the soviets tend to put more heavier armour on the field then the ostheer
Posts: 600
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
A StuG III is less likely to pen an IS2 than an SU-76 a King Tiger. A tad interesting that.
The damage and durability difference makes up fully for it.
TWP is also a factor.
Since when does anyone sit in front of a StuG III to shoot at it's frontal armor unless they are using an AT gun or TD with superior range? Yes the StuG III can technically bounce frontal shots from the weakest cheapest mediums in the game but that's not a very ringing endorsement.
Since you don't command SC2 stalkers who can blink on your rear but tanks and not use maphack for all the games.
Since opponents don't drive their stugs rear first.
Since the stug isn't used as breakthrough unit and is actually kept in the back.
The scenarios you create are always hilarious, like 2 omnipotent and always aware of everything supercomputers that know everything about positioning of opponenets(or at least the attacking one) dishing it out against each other.
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Then the advantage is with the su76 the soviets tend to put more heavier armour on the field then the ostheer
Agreed, Soviets put more heavier armour, because
T-34 have more armor than Pz.IV
T-34-85 > Pz.IV Ausf.J
KV-1 > Panther
SU-85 > JgPz.IV
ISU > Ele
And about 80 HP buff:
SU-76 surely doesn't need that buff, while StuG III definitely need 560 HP
because PTRS are better against StuG than Schreks aganst SU-76.
Livestreams
35 | |||||
8 | |||||
5 | |||||
4 | |||||
4 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
10 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Abtik Services
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM